Here is a discussion already started on my Forum. I would love to have it generated here too.
• View topic - Who said " electro-gravitics is a dead end"? and WHY
by Linda Brown » Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:00 pm
That phrase...." Electro-gravitics is a dead end" is a statement that has been hooted repeatedly by the Zorgon camp..... and it struck me suddenly that I need to investigate what it was that gave that particular phrase traction in his mind... who planted the seed of that phrase... where did it originate?
Just recently a "Roger Brown" used that exact phrase to try to persuade Dylan to change his interest on the subject and all of us wondered if there was some kind of a connection between he and Zorgon because of the similar phrasing... but the question came into my mind then just how did the word " Dead end" and " electro-gravitics" happen to be placed together? (because obviously it is a propaganda packed statement). Who would be promoting that thought? And how did it get started.
Oddly ..... I think that T. Townsend Brown himself might have been responsible for that.
I have been saying recently that I have gotten the feeling that Dad was somehow on a mission to " delay" the development of electrogravitics.... even though at the same time he SEEMED to be working with all of his strength to disclose material on it.
Its enough to make you want to bang your head repeatedly against the wall.... Why would he do that? It doesn't make sense...
But I believe if we look hard at the steps that were taken you will see a very elegant form of misdirection taking place here!... and the more elegant it is.... the more I believe those fingerprints are Dads!.
So lets follow this phrase..... " Electrogravitics is a dead end" to see who encouraged the first use of it. Anybody a betting person?
*************************************************************************************
Let me know what you think
and this next post on the token might be helpful too...
by Linda Brown » Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:33 pm
Before we jump into the deep water here of this discussion I guess its a good idea to explain to the " newbies" to the story of Townsend Brown.... how very much his name is connected to the word ELECTROGRAVITY.... OR ELECTROGRAVITICS.
Dad coined that name. Other writers who have done their homework properly credit Dad with the discovery of that effect when he was just a teenager.
Dr.Paul A. Violette for example produced a wondrous book called " Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion" and it was he who chose to introduce material on my Dads relationship with " ELECTROGRAVITY' in the first few pages of that book.
Page three as a matter of fact.... nice picture of my Dad... which I supplied to him through Qualight.( Andrew Bolland)
On page 9 he quotes part of Dads patent ( 300.311)
The invention also relates to machines or apparatus requiring electrical energy that control or influence the gravitational field or the energy of gravitation; also to machines or apparatus requiring electrical energy that exhibit a linear force or motion which is believed to be independent of all frames of reference save that which is at rest relative to the universe taken as a whole, and said linear force or motion is furthermore believed to have no equal and opposite reaction that can be observed by any method commonly known and accepted by the physical science to date.
He continues to explain ( page 9)...... " He is in effect suggesting that it violates Newtons third law of motion... that every action should produce an equal and opposite reaction. Dr. Patrick Cornille, who repeated Browns high voltage pendulum experiment came to the similar conclusion, that Newtons third law of Motion was indeed violated."
What would that mean..... actually?...... LaViolette describes it this way on page 17
" Just as a mass is forever able to fall into an infinitely deep pit, so too would this rotor be able to turn indefinitely without reaching the end of its potential energy supply. All the while power could be extracted from the wheels shaft at no cost.... save that to power the generators."
Read the rest of his absorbing book. It is nearly 100% about my Dads work.
And all of this is supposed to be a " dead end?" And even more interesting.... at least in this book Dr. Hal Puthoff is not even mentioned.
Linda.
**************************************************************************************
I thank all of you ahead of time for whatever you might decide to contribute. Linda