ts interesting to me that the four of the parties in question would take the time..after noticing his book and the comments that he made in it... to contradict what he had said.... or did they really. The letter with the four of their signatures prominently displayed makes a sort of show of it.... reprimanding him actually for " bad manners".... but what have they actually said. If they were REALLY upset he would be hearing from a lawyers office.
And I find it interesting when a CIA officer of any rank says that your story was " inaccurate".
Been my experience, if they want to discredit you.... and you have said that " so and so met so and so... at 7pm...." Everything mentioned could be totally accurate... but if the meeting was a 7:01.... You were " inaccurate" and if their cause needs to have that disclaimer out there they will certainly pull that on you.
The same thing applies to getting information....If your question is one inch off the mark in anyway they use it as an excuse not to know anything about THAT PARTICULAR situation because, you see, you have given them an open door. These are professionals at protecting and twisting information to benefit their side ( which I hope they all remember while they are doing it.... is OUR side too.) Linda