The Secret Agenda of High Level Freemasonry

Truth Vibrations

New member
Even though this problem continues to be uncovered, this can be a seen from another "insider" I have never ever heard prior.

What is the secret agenda of high level Freemasonry? Listen to this excerpt from our Red Ice Radio program with Christopher Knight from July 2011 for a fascinating and disturbing insight.

Christopher became a Freemason in 1976. Today he believes there is a Masonic agenda, yet another group is pulling the strings. We talk about the founding of America as the Masonic experiment and Washington, DC as Zion and the Pentagon as the Stonehenge of USA, designed according to ancient megalithic measurements.

Chris will also discuss the Masonic belief about The New Jerusalem and Yahweh coming back to rule the Earth.

 

ianchris948

New member
This is an excellent piece of information. I am reserved from giving commentary because I don't want to give my opposition the opportunity to discredit me, and indirectly damage the very important points that this interview brings up.

In the beginning Scotland Yard is mentioned briefly and from my understanding, in the United Kingdom there is a law against anyone employed or connected to Scotland Yard from being a member of Freemasonry.

In fact, I have read that each candidate is investigated to rule out any Masonic affiliation and each is required, by law, to provide a sworn affidavit stating they have never been connected to any Masonic organization or Chapter of Freemasonry nor do they intend to pursue or consider any invitation or future activity with these aforesaid societies.

According to my research, Scotland Yard strictly enforces that and in the event allegations are brought forth against anyone associated with Scotland Yard, for have connections to Freemasonry, they are immediately guilty as charged because "their silence counts against them" which is not only indefensible, but completely illegal.
 

ianchris948

New member
I stand corrected, the new policy was challenged and it seems Freemasonry was able to defeat the proposal. Seems suspicious because if they were not dangerous, there would be no reason for them to fight so viciously to protect their "anonymity."

Masons threaten legal action to keep anonymity (UK)
IRNA ^ | June 11
Posted on 6/11/2002 7:22:08 AM by Int

thr 064
UK-Freemasons /WRD/


Masons threaten legal action to keep anonymity


London, June 11, IRNA - Freemasons in Britain are threatening legal action to prevent the government from forcing its members in the police and other parts of the country's criminal justice system from identifying themselves.The United Grand Lodge, the London headquarters of the secret brotherhood, has taken legal advice that any plans to make disclosure compulsory would be is criminatory under Britain's recent Human Rights Act, the Financial Times reported Tuesday.


"We believe we are being singled out in a way that implies there is something wrong in being a freemason," the Grand Lodge's head of communications John Hamill was quoted saying. The British government made disclosure of freemasonry membership in the police and criminal justice system voluntary in 1979 following
concern in parliament over the role of improper influence by the secret brotherhood in public life.


But the response to voluntary registration has been slow and the Home Office has said that it has not ruled out making disclosure compulsory. According to the Financial Times, freemasons, who are estimated to number more than 300,000 in Britain, are encouraged by recent developments in Wales' devolved assembly following the incorporation of the European Human Rights Charter into British law.


Next month, the Cardiff-based assembly is due to vote out a stipulation that its elected members must register whether they are a freemason before taking office, fearing that it could be open to challenge under the Human Rights Act. Hamill was reported to be also masterminding a public relations exercise to dispel public suspicions about the activities of freemasons by drawing attention to the non-controversial and charitable activities undertaken by the brotherhood.

HC/HC
End
 

Linda Brown

New member
"Seems suspicious because if they were not dangerous, there would be no reason for them to fight so viciously to protect their "anonymity."

You might ask Mikado that same question. I would be curious to see what he himself would say.

I would venture a guess that he would say that anonymity is important for him because of the importance of his work and the need for security. That the public at large does not need to be able to reach him under his real name......... But is there something else going on too? Is he not dangerous?

I agree that a certain transparency is important. If you have important words to put out there ( as you have here, in your opinion) then it is also important to put your name out there for all to know....

For exactly the reason that you have inferred here Ianchris.... If you are not "above board.".. or happen to be a "dangerous" person with a nefarious agenda .... then it might be important for you to hide behind a" mask". You would not want others to link you personally to your actions.... and you would really be " vicious" in your defense of that "privacy."

IConsider this......iff the world was suffering under a vendetta against " porn stars" and being whipped up into acts of outrageous violence in their direction...... how would you feel about having a requirement out there to list your REAL name publically instead of a certain stage name? If you were a porn star of course. Are you "guilty" of something if you try to maintain a barrier for your own security?

Linda
 
Last edited:

ianchris948

New member
"Seems suspicious because if they were not dangerous, there would be no reason for them to fight so viciously to protect their "anonymity."

You might ask Mikado that same question. I would be curious to see what he himself would say.

I would venture a guess that he would say that anonymity is important for him because of the importance of his work and the need for security. That the public at large does not need to be able to reach him under his real name......... But is there something else going on too? Is he not dangerous?

I agree that a certain transparency is important. If you have important words to put out there ( as you have here, in your opinion) then it is also important to put your name out there for all to know....

For exactly the reason that you have inferred here Ianchris.... If you are not "above board.".. or happen to be a "dangerous" person with a nefarious agenda .... then it might be important for you to hide behind a" mask". You would not want others to link you personally to your actions.... and you would really be " vicious" in your defense of that "privacy."

IConsider this......iff the world was suffering under a vendetta against " porn stars" and being whipped up into acts of outrageous violence in their direction...... how would you feel about having a requirement out there to list your REAL name publically instead of a certain stage name? If you were a porn star of course. Are you "guilty" of something if you try to maintain a barrier for your own security?

Linda

Linda Brown, I was never "in" porn. I just know how to use my d__k like a "porn-star" ... which also happens to be my best physical attribute and the reason why so many people know me.... I don't hide who I am. I told you before that is impossible since I'm somewhat of a public figure. The entire world knows my name, Linda. Haven't you been paying attention?

The only reason why I don't use my real name as my user handle is because "AlejandroCarbajalEstrada" has too many characters and most user name fields don't allow that many characters.

You seem bothered... Don't tell me it has something to do with "Rosemary Economy" ...
 
Last edited:

Linda Brown

New member
I have no idea what the Rosemary Economy is....can you tell me what you mean.
Linda Brown, I was never "in" porn. I just know how to use my d__k like a "porn-star" ... which also happens to be my best physical attribute and the reason why so many people know me.... I don't hide who I am. I told you before that is impossible since I'm somewhat of a public figure. The entire world knows my name, Linda. Haven't you been paying attention?

The way that you were bragging about your sexual prowess.... I suppose I took that you were " in the business" for granted. You have to admit that few men are so bent ( sorry) on describing their manly powers and abilities. Like I said... with an ego like that... its a surprise that more hadn't made that mistake.... and still a wonder that you haven't found yourself there.

Have I been paying attention? I don't know... have I? Linda
 

ianchris948

New member
I have no idea what the Rosemary Economy is....can you tell me what you mean.
Linda Brown, I was never "in" porn. I just know how to use my d__k like a "porn-star" ... which also happens to be my best physical attribute and the reason why so many people know me.... I don't hide who I am. I told you before that is impossible since I'm somewhat of a public figure. The entire world knows my name, Linda. Haven't you been paying attention?

The way that you were bragging about your sexual prowess.... I suppose I took that you were " in the business" for granted. You have to admit that few men are so bent ( sorry) on describing their manly powers and abilities. Like I said... with an ego like that... its a surprise that more hadn't made that mistake.... and still a wonder that you haven't found yourself there.

Have I been paying attention? I don't know... have I? Linda

They don't call it "Penis-Envy," for nothing Linda... when women have nothing else to throw at a man, they always attempt to damage the man's ego in a last resort effort of digging in their claws.

My deceased partner owned a porn studio. It was his hobby and he was wealthy enough to afford himself the leisure. I was his beneficiary and I worked for the Trust Company that managed his real estate portfolio because his formal profession was as a real estate investor. It's no secret that gay men are horribly vain, competitive and predatory by nature and in that world the prettiest "peacock" with the biggest cock gets the worm, so to say. I never had a financial need to exploit myself, and I also have a problem with being labeled as a "hustler" which is the reason why I have taken such offense to the fact that my image has been used without my consent on a number of adult websites as the backlash for pursuing justice regarding my partner's homicide.

Unfortunately, in this country, "Justice" is a fallacy because our judicial system is infested with Masonic corruption. In the United Kingdom it is a known fact that Freemasons corrupt justice and there is a constant effort to maintain transparency within the justice department. However, because of a technicality Freemasons have been unable to be eradicated completely from the justice system in the United Kingdom, however it is is only a matter of time before Freemasons will no be allowed to use that technicality to hide behind anonymity. Personally, I don't understand how human rights even applies to them because it's not a religion, it's not a race or ethnic group and it's only agenda is to destroy the belief in God. Therefore, it is "Terrorism" and it should be addressed as such.

In this country, Freemasons are never brought on criminal charges for obstructing the law or preventing justice. Which means, there is no one within the justice department who is not corrupted by Freemasonry to be able to maintain transparency.

My legal matter is the proof.
 

Mikado

New member
"Seems suspicious because if they were not dangerous, there would be no reason for them to fight so viciously to protect their "anonymity."

You might ask Mikado that same question. I would be curious to see what he himself would say.

I would venture a guess that he would say that anonymity is important for him because of the importance of his work and the need for security. That the public at large does not need to be able to reach him under his real name......... But is there something else going on too? Is he not dangerous?

I agree that a certain transparency is important. If you have important words to put out there ( as you have here, in your opinion) then it is also important to put your name out there for all to know....

For exactly the reason that you have inferred here Ianchris.... If you are not "above board.".. or happen to be a "dangerous" person with a nefarious agenda .... then it might be important for you to hide behind a" mask". You would not want others to link you personally to your actions.... and you would really be " vicious" in your defense of that "privacy."

IConsider this......iff the world was suffering under a vendetta against " porn stars" and being whipped up into acts of outrageous violence in their direction...... how would you feel about having a requirement out there to list your REAL name publically instead of a certain stage name? If you were a porn star of course. Are you "guilty" of something if you try to maintain a barrier for your own security?

Linda


Dangerous? To whom? To you and all the little games you play with people. Dangerous because I know the truth about a good deal of "things" you proclaim as truth.

Anonymity is required, you agreed to it in the beginning and now you claim something different, why? Because recent events have shown that you are the one afraid, afraid of what I have to say about so many things and it all began with the "due-diligence". Talk about an iceberg hitting the unsinkable Resolute...she has been taking on water...have enough lifeboats?

Mikado
 

Linda Brown

New member
Anonymity is required, you agreed to it in the beginning and now you claim something different, why? Because recent events have shown that you are the one afraid, afraid of what I have to say about so many things and it all began with the "due-diligence". Talk about an iceberg hitting the unsinkable

Oh THERE you are Mikado. I was wondering when you would join the fray here. At least with you both posting I can keep track between you and Ianchris though I have to admit... taking on the role of the self confessed gay lover of a porn producer... thats a bit of a stretch, even for you

You have other things in common though.... and it will be interesting to compare what you each have to say here....

You know what I think of your " Due Diligence ? Its faulty, agenda driven and not worth the powder to blow it up. Just my opinion here.

You keep saying things but I see no proof of anything. Its all just smoke and hot air.

The Resolute sinking? Whatever you say dear.

Linda
 

ianchris948

New member
Anonymity is required, you agreed to it in the beginning and now you claim something different, why? Because recent events have shown that you are the one afraid, afraid of what I have to say about so many things and it all began with the "due-diligence". Talk about an iceberg hitting the unsinkable

Oh THERE you are Mikado. I was wondering when you would join the fray here. At least with you both posting I can keep track between you and Ianchris though I have to admit... taking on the role of the self confessed gay lover of a porn producer... thats a bit of a stretch, even for you

You have other things in common though.... and it will be interesting to compare what you each have to say here....

You know what I think of your " Due Diligence ? Its faulty, agenda driven and not worth the powder to blow it up. Just my opinion here.

You keep saying things but I see no proof of anything. Its all just smoke and hot air.

The Resolute sinking? Whatever you say dear.

Linda


CANCER IS NEVER THE IMMEDIATE CAUSE OF DEATH .... it is a scientific and medical fact because "cancer" indirectly causes death.

For the record we weren't "lovers" ... I don't know why everyone assumes a domestic partnership is about sex because it's not, it's about money, trust and security.

Perhaps Ms. Brown would like to provide her explanation why someone who never had cancer suddenly "dies" from "cancer" at a hospital that claims that person was not one of their patients?

D_mn I almost forgot I'm f_cking delusional, and it's widely accepted when a perfectly healthy person goes missing, and ends up dead, without a body or ashes ... and don't say he faked his death because if he did and didn't bother to tell me, I will make sure he regrets that decision and if that's the case, he's going to wish he was dead everyday until he does finally die.

Because if I wasn't for me, he wouldn't have had closure with his mother the day she died.... and the effort I gave to make that possible was not for free. Call me whatever you want, just don''t call me a "gold-digger" for having enough self-worth to know the value of making the impossible a reality. I gave him something priceless, and in return he made me his beneficiary. I was the only one in his life who he could depend on because I earned his trust. Unfortunately, be was an Aries and horribly competitive to a complete fault. However, I do not compete; I do whatever it takes to make sure I win by eliminating the competition.

So to maintain balance and harmony I would take a hiatus every few months, which worked until his mother died because then the man regressed and I turned into his father and I even channeled the father on a couple occasions. The father was a cop and I began using phrases and words, tone of voice, etc of the father who died when my partner was 17yrs old. The problem was because Palm Springs was the only private environment we had. The house in LA had live-in domestic/ service workers who were always present. I grew up with live-in's and because of it, I distrust them. Based on my experiences, they are very advantageous when their employer dies.

They were the ones who prevented me from entering the house after he died. I am 5'7'' and I weigh 120 pounds. I went to the house with the Sheriffs on more than one occasion. MY attorney didn't do his job, so I filed a small claims lawsuit against the Successor Trustee. After the third time he failed to show up to court, I served his attorney, who lived in a high rise complex with a 24 hr onsite concierge/ security guard and it took the the deputy sheriff four attempts to serve the court summons and the reason why he was finally successful was because the attorney was expecting a sex-hook and the deputy sheriff showed up at 4am and the attorney thought it was the "trick" so she told the guard to send him up. The reason why I know that, is because that's what came to me during a channeling.

D_mn there I go again with delusional b_llsh_t... but it does not matter because

"CANCER IS NEVER THE IMMEDIATE CAUSE OF DEATH"
 
Last edited:

Linda Brown

New member
And no one in certain businesses have what they call at the hospital.... a sudden and massive heart attack either............... Linda
 

Linda Brown

New member
CANCER IS NEVER THE IMMEDIATE CAUSE OF DEATH .... it is a scientific and medical fact because "cancer" indirectly causes death.

For the record we weren't "lovers" ... I don't know why everyone assumes a domestic partnership is about sex because it's not, it's about money, trust and security. Alot of marriages are like that too Ianchris...........Perhaps Ms. Brown would like to provide her explanation why someone who never had cancer suddenly "dies" from "cancer" at a hospital that claims that person was not one of their patients? If you can explain to me how someone diagnosed with " terminal cancer" can walk out of the hospital he thought he was going to die in..... two weeks later.... cancer free.

D_mn I almost forgot I'm f_cking delusional, and it's widely accepted when a perfectly healthy person goes missing, and ends up dead, without a body or ashes ... and don't say he faked his death because if he did and didn't bother to tell me, ( why not say that?.... just because it would be tough on you as his partner? REALLY?) I will make sure he regrets that decision and if that's the case, he's going to wish he was dead everyday until he does finally die. ( No you wouldn't... You would be happy to see him alive and well.)[/COLOR Been there. Done that.Because if I wasn't for me, he wouldn't have had closure with his mother the day she died.... and the effort I gave to make that possible was not for free. Call me whatever you want, just don''t call me a "gold-digger" for having enough self-worth to know the value of making the impossible a reality. I gave him something priceless, and in return he made me his beneficiary. I was the only one in his life who he could depend on because I earned his trust. Unfortunately, be was an Aries and horribly competitive to a complete fault. However, I do not compete; I do whatever it takes to make sure I win by eliminating the competition.( so who is your competition now Ianchris?)
So to maintain balance and harmony I would take a hiatus every few months, which worked until his mother died because then the man regressed and I turned into his father and I even channeled the father on a couple occasions. The father was a cop and I began using phrases and words, tone of voice, etc of the father who died when my partner was 17yrs old. The problem was because Palm Springs was the only private environment we had. The house in LA had live-in domestic/ service workers who were always present. I grew up with live-in's and because of it, I distrust them. Based on my experiences, they are very advantageous when their employer dies.

They were the ones who prevented me from entering the house after he died. I am 5'7'' and I weigh 120 pounds. I went to the house with the Sheriffs on more than one occasion. MY attorney didn't do his job, so I filed a small claims lawsuit against the Successor Trustee. After the third time he failed to show up to court, I served his attorney, who lived in a high rise complex with a 24 hr onsite concierge/ security guard and it took the the deputy sheriff four attempts to serve the court summons and the reason why he was finally successful was because the attorney was expecting a sex-hook and the deputy sheriff showed up at 4am and the attorney thought it was the "trick" so she told the guard to send him up. The reason why I know that, is because that's what came to me during a channeling.

Strange stuff at work here Ianchris. LindaD_mn there I go again with delusional b_llsh_t... but it does not matter because

"CANCER IS NEVER THE IMMEDIATE CAUSE OF DEATH"



Ianchris.... why do I remind you of your Godmother? Linda
 
Last edited:

ianchris948

New member
Perhaps Ms. Brown would like to provide her explanation why someone who never had cancer suddenly "dies" from "cancer" at a hospital that claims that person was not one of their patients? If you can explain to me how someone diagnosed with " terminal cancer" can walk out of the hospital he thought he was going to die in..... two weeks later.... cancer free.

Like I said, "Cancer is never the immediate cause of death"

When patients suffering from cancer get diagnosed as terminal, the reason is because the cancer is advancing at a rate which the individual's organs cannot sustain for more than x-amount of time. Based on that mathematical calculation, medical doctors are able to determine how long the organs will continue to function before failing, which is the reason why people die from "COMPLICATIONS" with cancer. The most common complication is organ failure, sometimes it is drug overdose, but the IMMEDIATE cause is still organ failure.

Which is the reason why "CANCER DOES NOT CAUSE DEATH" ... it only contributes to what causes death. If cancer caused death, no one would live to say they won their battle with cancer.
 

Mikado

New member
Anonymity is required, you agreed to it in the beginning and now you claim something different, why? Because recent events have shown that you are the one afraid, afraid of what I have to say about so many things and it all began with the "due-diligence". Talk about an iceberg hitting the unsinkable

Oh THERE you are Mikado. I was wondering when you would join the fray here. At least with you both posting I can keep track between you and Ianchris though I have to admit... taking on the role of the self confessed gay lover of a porn producer... thats a bit of a stretch, even for you

You have other things in common though.... and it will be interesting to compare what you each have to say here....

You know what I think of your " Due Diligence ? Its faulty, agenda driven and not worth the powder to blow it up. Just my opinion here.

You keep saying things but I see no proof of anything. Its all just smoke and hot air.

The Resolute sinking? Whatever you say dear.

Linda


With all the visits you make to the Hut I am surprised that you have not read any of the section on the Due-Diligence.

Go read it, enough powder there to blow a few holes in Paul's book but then, that is not his fault, it was all the stories told by ...ahem...anonymous individuals and as you have said, anonymous individuals are dangerous.

...start the bilge pumps.

Mikado
 
Top