On May 17, 2013, the Pentagon-affiliated RAND Corporation, issued a report, entitled “Iran After the Bomb: How Would a Nuclear-Armed Tehran Behave?”, authored by it senior ME expert, Iranian-born anti-Islamic regime Alireza Nader.

The 50-page report concludes that a nuclear-armed Iran would not pose an “existential threat” to the United States, Israel and the West’s puppet regimes in the region. The report confirms that Tehran may pursue military nuclear capability as a ”detrrent” against its enemies, mainly Israel or its “Guardian Angle”, the United States.

The report further states that Iran will never attack its Muslim neighbors or Israel, as it could be suicidal for the Islamic regime while the Zionist regime having a stockpile of nuclear bombs. Having a “rational leadership”, Iran will never transfer its nuclear arms to its allies in the region, namely, Hizbullah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Syria and Iraq. However, a nuclear Iran, will no doubt provide a booster to the anti-Israel resistance groups.

Last year, Maj. Gen. Amir Eshel, head of the Israel Occupation Force (IOF) planning department, told reporters in Jerusalem that once Iran poseses nuclear arsenal, it will make hard for Israel to defeat Hamas and Hizbullah.

A nuclear-armed Iran, in the eyes of the powerful Israel Lobby (AIPAC), which controls both Congress and Senate, is an “existential threat” to the Zionist entity.

Tehran vehemently denies it intends to build a nuclear bomb as its religious leaders consider WMDs against the Islamic teachings. That’s why, the US-Israel have lowered the “red line” level on Iran’s nuclear program. Now, “all options including a military attack” are on the table even if Iran achieves the “nuclear capability”.

RAND conclusion is not much different than the earlier studies published by pro-Israel think tanks like Center for a New American Security (CNAS). Its Jewish analyst, Colin Kahl, former top ME policy adviser at the Pentagon, has recently published a report, entitled “If All Else Fails: The Challenges of Containing a Nuclear-Armed Iran” – suggests extending Washington’s nuclear umbrella over Israel and Arab nation-states ruled by the western-puppets.

Former CIA analyst, Dr. Kenneth Pollock, a Zionist Jew, who is senior fellow at the pro-Israel Jewish think tank, Brookings Institute, and author of 2002 pro-Iraq war book “The Threatening Storm“, recommends a “containment strategy” for Iran if it goes ahead making a nuclear bomb.

Last year, Paul Pillar, a veteran CIA analyst (2000-2005), argued at the Washington Monthly that the US can live with a nuclear-armed Iran – and fears of a bomb in Tehran’s hands are overhyped, and “a war to prevent it would be a disaster”.

Dr. Trita Parsi, head of anti-Islamists and anti-war group, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), also against a military attack on Iran while criticizing Tehran for its human right abuses. Last year, Muslim-hating pro-Israel Jewish academic, Daniel Pipes ran a vicious smear campaign to discredit Dr. Parsi and his organization.

Report: A nuclear Iran poses no threat to US or Israel | Rehmat's World