Welcome to the Unhypnotize Truth Community!
A great place to discuss conspiracies, UFOs, NWO, truth, reality and enlightenment.

• » Conspiracies Discussions
• » UFOs and Extraterrestrial
• » Spiritual and Paranormal
• » World and Alternative News

Its time to wake up to the global conspiracy...and move beyond...
Our community is here to spread truth, discuss the Global Conspiracy and the world wide Truth Movement!

YES! I want to register for free right now!
Page 9 of 10 First ... 78910 Last
Results 81 to 90 of 94

Thread: OSAMA bin LADEN DEAD - CNN.com

  1. #81

    Why Didn’t We Capture the Terrorist Kingpin and Interrogate Him?

    Washington’s Blog
    May 5, 2011

    I’m as happy as the next red-blooded American that Bin Laden is dead.

    For more than a decade, the government has said that Bin Laden is the world’s worst terrorist, a terrorist kingpin, the head of the worst terrorist group in the world.

    But if we captured and interrogated him, he could have spilled a lot of beans which would help prevent future terrorist attacks.


    But as the Atlantic reports today:

    There’s one option the administration appears to have never seriously considered: taking bin Laden alive.


    The administration had made clear to the military’s clandestine Joint Special Operations Command that it wanted bin Laden dead, according to a senior U.S. official with knowledge of the discussions. A high-ranking military officer briefed on the assault said the SEALs knew their mission was not to take him alive.
    The White House now admits that Bin Laden wasn’t armed, so why wasn’t he captured? The government says that the Seals who entered the compound thought he was reaching for a weapon.

    That might be true, although Bin Laden wasn’t exactly a healthy spring chicken. Indeed, Bin Laden was already pretty sickly by late 2001. (Don’t worry: This post won’t go down any rabbit holes regarding claims that Bin Laden died years ago.)

    As CNN terrorism analyst Peter Bergen – who met Bin Laden and studied Bin Laden and his operation for many years – told CNN in 2002:

    He’s aged enormously between ’97 and October of last year.

    This is a man who was clearly not well. I mean, as you see from these pictures here, he’s really, by December he’s looking pretty terrible. But by December, of course, that tape that was aired then, he’s barely moving the left side of his body. So he’s clearly got diabetes. He has low blood pressure. He’s got a wound in his foot. He’s apparently got dialysis … for kidney problems.

    I mean, this is a man who has a number of health problems, apart from the fact that anybody running around the Afghan mountains is not going to be in great shape.
    Indeed, the oldest – and second-largest – French newspaper claims that Bin Laden was in the hospital for kidney failure two months before 9/11. As the Guardian notes:

    Two months before September 11 Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital, where he was visited by the local CIA agent, according to the French newspaper Le Figaro.

    The disclosures are known to come from French intelligence which is keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA, and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere.

    Bin Laden is reported to have arrived in Dubai on July 4 from Quetta in Pakistan with his own personal doctor, nurse and four bodyguards, to be treated in the urology department.


    Bin Laden has often been reported to be in poor health. Some accounts claim that he is suffering from Hepatitis C, and can expect to live for only two more years.

    According to Le Figaro, last year he ordered a mobile dialysis machine to be delivered to his base at Kandahar in Afghanistan.

    And CBS news reported that Bin Laden was ill on September 10, 2001, being treated in a Pakistan hospital with kidney dialysis:

    In addition, it is rumored that Bin Laden had Marfan Syndrome – a disorder of the connective tissue, which usually shortens the life span (Abraham Lincoln had Marfan).

    As Salon noted in November 2001:

    Judging by photos and the FBI’s physical records, Osama bin Laden could be a candidate for the diagnosis. He is said to be between 6 foot 4 inches and 6 foot 6, which is apparently unusual for his family. He is thin, bony and has little muscle; he weighs only 160 pounds. And he uses a cane — possibly the result of connective tissue or back problems. Other information about the leader of al-Qaida suggests he may have a heart condition. His facial structure also resembles that of people with Marfan.

    “He is Marfanoid,” says Dr. Richard Devereux, a clinician who treats patients with the illness at the Weill Cornell Medical Center in New York. “He seems to have long fingers and long arms. His head appears to be elongated and his face narrow … It’s certainly conceivable that he has the Marfan syndrome and could be evaluated for it.”

    Though people have long speculated about bin Laden having Marfan, federal officials won’t answer questions about his health. “We don’t discuss the medical conditions of our enemy commanders,” says Maj. Jay Steuck, a Defense Department spokesman. And a Central Intelligence Agency spokesman says, “We don’t do unclassified medical summaries.”


    Yossef Bodansky, staff director of the House Task Force on Terrorism, told the New York Post: “We are getting a lot of reports and rumors. By all accounts, bin Laden is not a healthy man and is under a lot of stress.”

    David K. Schenker, a research fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, agrees that bin Laden’s size is atypical for his surroundings. “I lived in the Middle East, and I never ran into anyone that tall,” he says.


    Should bin Laden have Marfan syndrome, the stress of cave-hopping and trying to outrun Allied cruise missiles could prove deadly. “People with the disease are told not to engage in heavy exercise,” says Dr. Darwin Prockop, director of the Center for Gene Therapy at Tulane University. “If Osama bin Laden has Marfan, he is in danger of sudden rupture of the aorta and sudden death.”
    Again, this post will not go down the rabbit hole to ask whether Bin Laden died prior to Sunday’s raid. I am only focusing on the fact that Bin Laden was probably not a movie script type healthy young terrorist when he was thought to be reaching for a gun.

    In addition, Bin Laden’s 12 year old daughter purportedly claims that Bin Laden was successfully captured alive first and then later summarily executed by the troops. Hopefully, this isn’t true.

    But assuming the government’s version of events is true, why didn’t the seals use knock-out gas and capture him? Even common thugs use knock out gas. For example, the U.S. state department warns:

    Do not accept food or drink from strangers. Criminals have been known to drug food or drink offered to passengers. Criminals may also spray sleeping gas in train compartments. Where possible, lock your compartment. If it cannot be locked securely, take turns sleeping in shifts with your traveling companions. If that is not possible, stay awake. If you must sleep unprotected, tie down your luggage and secure your valuables to the extent possible.
    (Be careful if you take any night trains in Italy).

    If common hoodlams knock out their victims, you know that the U.S. military has stuff they can easily lob in and knock everyone out. Why didn’t the government knock out Bin Laden and then hall him off to the interrogation room?

    Indeed, the U.S. may have gotten the clue about Osama bin Laden’s Abbottabad location in 2008. As the Guardian notes:

    US may have got Osama bin Laden’s Abbottabad clue in 2008 – WikiLeaks

    Courier’s interrogation at Guantánamo revealed network of messengers that US traced to track down the al-Qaida leader

    The US may have obtained a clue three years ago that Osama bin Laden was hiding in Abbottabad, according to information gathered by interrogators at Guantánamo.


    WikiLeaks released the report last week, prompting speculation that the US, afraid that its planned raid might be pre-empted, brought forward its attack.
    So the U.S. could have knocked him out in 2008 and interrogated him.

    As I’ve pointed out before, the U.S. had multiple opportunities to get Bin Laden in 2001 and 2007:

    According to the U.S. Senate – Bin Laden was “within the grasp” of the U.S. military in Afghanistan in December 2001, but that then-secretary of defense Rumsfeld refused to provide the soldiers necessary to capture him.

    This is not news: it was disclosed in 2005 by the CIA field commander for the area in Afghanistan where Bin Laden was holed up.

    In addition, French soldiers allegedly say that they easily could have captured or killed Bin Laden in Afghanistan, but that the American commanders stopped them.


    A retired Colonel and Fox News military analyst said that the U.S. could have killed Bin Laden in 2007, but didn’t:

    We know, with a 70 percent level of certainty — which is huge in the world of intelligence — that in August of 2007, bin Laden was in a convoy headed south from Tora Bora. We had his butt, on camera, on satellite. We were listening to his conversations. We had the world’s best hunters/killers — Seal Team 6 [Note: this is the exact same team that is credited with killing Bin Laden yesterday] — nearby. We had the world class Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) coordinating with the CIA and other agencies. We had unmanned drones overhead with missiles on their wings; we had the best Air Force on the planet, begging to drop one on the terrorist. We had him in our sights; we had done it ….Unbelievably, and in my opinion, criminally, we did not kill Usama bin Laden.
    Indeed, a United States Congressman claims that the Bush administration intentionally let Bin Laden escape in order to justify the Iraq war.
    Moreover, as I’ve previously noted, capturing Bin Laden and taking down Al Qaeda was never the real priority:

    American historian, investigative journalist and policy analyst Gareth Porter writes in the Asia Times:

    Feith’s book, War and Decision, released last month, provides excerpts of the paper Rumsfeld sent to President George W Bush on September 30, 2001, calling for the administration to focus not on taking down Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network but on the aim of establishing “new regimes” in a series of states…

    If we had really wanted to get Bin Laden, we would have gotten him in 2001 (indeed, the Taliban offered to turn him over), or 2007.
    And Gareth Porter reported yesterday that the U.S. didn’t even consider capturing Bin Laden as part of its Afghanistan war strategy:

    The absence of any military planning to catch bin Laden was a function of Bush’s national security team, led by Vice-President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld, which had firmly opposed any military operation in Afghanistan that would have had any possibility of catching bin Laden and his lieutenants.

    Rumsfeld and the second-ranking official at the Pentagon, Paul Wolfowitz, had dismissed CIA warnings of an al Qaeda terrorist attack against the United States in the summer of 2001, and even after 9/11 had continued to question the CIA’s conclusion that bin Laden and al Qaeda were behind the attacks.

    Cheney and Rumsfeld were determined not to allow a focus on bin Laden to interfere with their plan for a U.S. invasion of Iraq to overthrow the Saddam Hussein regime.

    Even after Bush decided in favour of an Afghan campaign, CENTCOM commander Tommy Franks, who was responsible for the war in Afghanistan, was not directed to have a plan for bin Laden’s capture or to block his escape to Pakistan.
    We tortured a bunch of innocent farmers, children, grandparents and reporters … supposedly to get information about Bin Laden. But it doesn’t seem like the government was very interested in actually interrogating Bin Laden himself.


  2. #82

    Obama’s bin Laden speech photo staged

    International Business Times
    May 5, 2011

    The White House hotly debated whether to release photos of Osama Bin Laden after Sunday’s raid on his Pakistan compound, but when it came to the President’s own photos, there was only one way to go: staged.

    While the photo that ran on many newspapers and websites the next morning appeared as if it were taken during Obama’s address to the nation the night before, it was actually the result of an elaborate post-speech production.

    “As President Obama continued his nine-minute address in front of just one main network camera, the photographers were held outside the room by staff and asked to remain completely silent,” Reuters photographer Jason Reed explained in his blog.

    “Once Obama was off the air, we were escorted in front of that teleprompter and the President then re-enacted the walk-out and first 30 seconds of the statement for us.”

    The procedure was put in place apparently as a method to mitigate the distracting noise of the photographer’s cameras and also give opportunity for journalists from different organizations to get directly in front of the president.

    Reed describes how the president gave his speech to a single TV camera, then immediately after finishing, he pretended to speak for the still cameras.

    The move is not without precedent. Several presidents have staged photos in recent history of the White House, according to John Harrington, the president of the White House News Photographers Association.

    “I am aware of it happening in previous administrations,” Harrington tells Poynter Institute.

    “The times where I have known of it happening before is when the president is in the Oval Office and you are working in a very tight space.”


  3. #83

    Hillary Clinton Claims ‘Allergy Not Anguish’ Reason For Photo As Evidence Points to PR Stunt

    Clinton: allergy, not anguish in my bin Laden photo

    Thursday, May 5, 2011

    RELATED: Staged: White House “Situation Room” Photos Part Of Bin Laden Fable

    (Reuters) – An allergy and not anguish may explain why Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had her hand to her mouth while watching the commando operation to kill Osama bin Laden, she said on Thursday.

    “Those were 38 of the most intense minutes. I have no idea what any of us were looking at that particular millisecond when the picture was taken,” she said on Thursday when asked about the photo during a visit to Rome.

    “I am somewhat sheepishly concerned that it was my preventing one of my early spring allergic coughs. So it may have no great meaning whatsoever,” Clinton added.

    Full story here.


  4. #84

    Shot Dead With Money Sewn Into his Clothes': Bin Laden was Captured Alive and then Executed, 'Claims Daughter, 12'

    - Bin Laden had £450 sewn into his clothes, ready to flee
    - Wife confronted U.S. forces and was shot but not killed
    - She was NOT the human shield who tried to protect him
    - US and Pakistan in 'custody battle' over wife
    - British bishop: 'This isn't justice, it's revenge'
    - Ken Livingstone: Killing makes Obama look like a 'mobster'
    - Flags burned at pro-bin Laden protests in Quetta, Pakistan

    Osama Bin Laden's daughter has claimed he was captured alive in his Pakistani hideout and then shot by U.S. special forces, it was reported today.

    Arabic news network Al-Arabiya quoted 'senior Pakistani security officials' who said the 12-year-old saw her father executed and his body dragged to a helicopter.

    A Pakistani official rejected U.S. accounts of a bloody firefight, saying: 'Not a single bullet was fired from the compound at the U.S. forces and their choppers. Their chopper developed some technical fault and crashed and the wreckage was left on the spot.'


    Read more: Shot Dead With Money Sewn Into his Clothes': Bin Laden was Captured Alive and then Executed, 'Claims Daughter, 12'

  5. #85

    White House Press Secretary “Floundering Under Pressure” Of Flip-Flopping Bin Laden Fable

    Jay Carney is floundering under pressure, say Washington insiders

    Toby Young
    London Telegraph
    Thursday, May 5, 2011

    There is increasing concern in Washington that Jay Carney, the new White House Press Secretary, isn’t up to the job. Even when faced with an innocuous question that requires only that he trot out the official line, he looks completely stunned, as if the questioner is Bob Woodward asking him about Deep Throat. He gathers himself, embarks on a stuttering reply, pauses for what seems like an eternity, then starts gabbling, tripping over his words, rephrasing what he’s just said, then looking plaintively back at the questioner as if to say, “How did I do? Was that okay? Or would you like me to try again?”

    “I think he’s doing very badly,” says a political contact based in Washington. “And I’ve heard others say that he’s really struggling.”

    This is a pivotal moment in Barack Obama’s presidency, a moment when the eyes of the world are locked on Washington. In the global battle for hearts and minds, it is essential that the leader of the free world exudes an air of calm authority at this time. Yet the White House’s handling of the media in the aftermath of Sunday’s events has been breathtakingly amateurish, planting seeds of doubt about the legality of the operation and about Osama bin Laden’s death that would not otherwise be there. The constantly changing narrative – or “fact pattern”, as one White House official described it – suggests that the president and his advisers have been caught on the hop and have no clear strategy for dealing with the fallout from bin Laden’s death. This is epitomised by the halting, timid delivery of Jay – “How’m I doin’?” – Carney, who must bear some of the responsibility for this communications failure.

    Full story here.


  6. #86

    9/11 Families Snub Obama’s “Photo-Op”; ‘Show Us The Bin Laden Proof’

    Sun Sentinel
    Thursday, May 5, 2011

    As 50 carefully selected families prepare to join President Barack Obama for a ceremony at the World Trade Center site Thursday, one of the invited 9/11 families have decided to pass on the Commander-in-chief’s visit.

    “There is no closure,” a sobbing John Vigiano said. “There is none.”

    “I’m honored the President of the United States is coming to New York,” he said. “[But] to me its just going to be a photo op.”

    Jeannie Evans, of Elmont, who lost her baby brother firefighter Robert Evans on 9/11 will also not be there Thursday. She wasn’t invited.

    “Why not show us proof, that Bin Laden was killed? I would like to see that,” wondered Evans.

    Full story here.


  7. #87

    Christiane Amanpour in 2008: Bin Laden Living In Comfortable Villa In Pakistan

    Thursday, May 5, 2011

    Excerpt from Real Time With Bill Maher, aired on October 3rd, 2008. Christiane Amanpour revealed that at least one person in US intelligence suspected Osama Bin Laden was residing in a comfortable villa inside Pakistan, not a cave.


  8. #88

    Paul Craig Roberts: What Is The Agenda Behind The Bin Laden Fable?

    Prison Planet.com
    Thursday, May 5, 2011

    The US government’s bin Laden story was so poorly crafted that it did not last 48 hours before being fundamentally altered. What agenda or agendas is the “death of bin Laden” designed to further?

    Dr. Paul Craig Roberts is the father of Reaganomics and the former head of policy at the Department of Treasury.


  9. #89

    Abbottabad residents: Operation of killing Bin Laden a hoax

    "US President Barack Obama's dramatic announcement that the world's most wanted man, Osama Bin Laden was shot dead in a compound in Pakistan's north western city of Abbotabad surprised the world.
    At a distance of about a hundred and thirty kilometers from the federal capital, the garrison city of Abbotabad is a picturesque valley in the foothills of the Karakarom.
    Abbottabad is an important military center being the headquarters of an Army brigade.
    On May 1st US President Barack Obama's announcement surprised the people of Pakistan but most of all the Government and the armed forces.
    Obama calls it an intelligence driven operation.
    An eyewitness of Pakistan said, "We are not fools, it's America, and the dirty American policies. Whenever they want to take control of an area, they act this way. Osama was never here, America wants to destroy the image of the Pakistan army."
    Pakistan president Asif ali Zardari has denied that Pakistan knew about Osama's presence in the country.
    And those who live close to this compound say bin Laden was never in that house.
    An eyewitness of Pakistan said, "I have lived here all my life, I have never seen Osama Bin Laden come or go from here. We are a close knit community. At least we would have seen him once, but we did not. And even if he was killed, the Pakistan army should have conducted the operation"
    When I spoke with the members of the anti terrorist squad, surprisingly even they couldn't confirm Bin Laden's killing.
    Then what are the facts?
    Muhammad Imran is a Taliban expert.
    Taliban expert Muhammad Imran said, "The people who are living in the adjacent areas and who are the neighbors of this compound, they have a focus on one point, there are certain issues that need to be addressed and I think with the passage of time the story will unfold about what actually happened. Apparently we believe that Bin Laden was here and was killed during the operation, conducted by the american marines."
    There are a number of contradictory theories and growing speculation following Osama Bin Laden's death as to how and why the operation was carried out in the way it was.
    Locals living in the neighborhood say that this operation was a hoax. And if such a high profile target WAS living here, then why didn't the Pakistani army carry out this operation? Why wasn't Pakistan kept in the picture. These are the questions that need to be answered by the United states"

  10. #90

    The Growing Coverup: Osama and “The Big Lie”

    Larry Chin
    Global Research
    May 6, 2011

    The Obama administration and the corporate media are concocting an ever-more elaborate and spectacular theater around the “heroic” murder of the CIA intelligence myth/CIA asset Osama bin Laden. Not content to simply to exploit the 9/11 atrocity for political gain, the administration is heaping new layers of lie and cover-up to the original crime.

    The growing cover-up

    The desperation is palpable. Just days since the “big announcement”, Obama administration officials have already been*forced to backpedal, issuing multiple corrections, adding to the confusion over the location of the killing, whether bin Laden was armed or unarmed, whether there was a “fire fight”, if an alleged wife was involved, the burial at sea, whether to release “graphic photos”, etc. The mainstream corporate media—following approved CIA/White House narratives—is spewing and regurgitating a tidal wave of red herrings that add to the inconsistencies.

    Seasoned observers will not be fooled, no matter how many Obama lies, doctored photos, fake footage, lurid new testimonials and CIA pronouncements are pushed forth. As put simply by*Paul Craig Roberts:

    “As the alleged body has been dumped into the ocean, nothing remains but the word of the*US*government, which lied about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and al Qaeda connections, about yellowcake, about Iranian nukes, and, according to thousands of experts, about 9/11. Suddenly the government is telling us the truth about bin Laden’s death?* If you believe that, I have a bridge in*Brooklyn*that I’ll let you have for a good price.”

    The “war on terrorism” is a fabrication,*war propaganda that continues to serve as the eternal pretext for global resource war. That 9/11 was a false flag operation—that the official story is a lie and cover-up—has been definitively proven in numerous investigations, such as Mike Ruppert’s*Crossing the Rubicon, Michel Chossudovsky’s*America’s “War on Terrorism”, the work of*Paul Thompson, and others.

    Osama bin Laden is a product and asset of the CIA.*“Al-Qaeda” is a covert operation, a*“database” of intelligence legends, exhaustively detailed in the work of Chaim Kupferberg (Part 1 and**Part Two).*Pakistan’s ISI, a virtual branch of the CIA, was central to 9/11 and a player in subsequent “terror” operations. It is not surprising that*Pakistan*and the ISI is at the heart of the “death of bin Laden” as well.

    The “death of bin Laden” changes nothing about the factual record that indicts (among others) Bush/Cheney, Anglo-American military-intelligence, and elite war/oil interests.

    Tragically, none of this matters. The minority of individuals with unscrambled brains is not the target of this imperial charade.

    Euphoria, brainwashing, and “imperial mobilization”

    To borrow from the lexicon of world planner Zbigniew Brzezinski, 9/11 was a successful**attack “on the order of*Pearl Harbor” that “united” the American people behind an “imperial mobilization”—the “war on terrorism” for oil. With 9/11, the masses fully supported nearly a decade of war, atrocities, subversion, and unprecedented government criminality.

    The militant and unquestioning public embrace of “war on terrorism” lies underscores how that the 9/11 has succeeded beyond the wildest dreams of the Anglo-American war criminals who orchestrated it.

    Now Barack Obama, who has spoken incessantly over the years about wanting to “unite” America again “just as it was after 9/11”, has been granted his moment to “unite” the masses again, but do an even better job of population control than Bush/Cheney (who, in their clumsiness and hubris, partially “squandered” their “political capital”). The swaggering Obama will “get it right”. He is a better actor, the more devious and mendacious corporatist who was selected for this specific purpose.

    Obama has been*itching to be the “Osama killer” since before he was elected.

    The 9/11 “shock effect” remains fully potent, as evidenced by the frenzy, euphoria, and stomach-turning jubilation of crowds of Americans joining in celebration orgies over a fictional murder of the fictional Osama bin Laden, a fictional revenge. Even the “intellectuals” and “experts” are treating this charade as if it is real. Corporate media headlines have declared that “the world has changed”, and the masses love it.

    The post-9/11 era has spawned an entire generation of vicious and ignorant drones, whose moral compass has been shaped by war, lies, violent entertainment, and brainwashing. The future American police state will be built upon this new culture of thuggery. This is*“Obama’s Animal Farm”.

    To Obama, this is “what makes*America*great”.

    Rescripting reality

    In Orwellian fashion, the legend of the death of Bin Laden changes nothing in reality, but turns the mass perception of this reality upside down.

    Suddenly, an unpopular Obama and his failing presidency are recast, in true Bush/Cheney fashion, as a heroic—and now successful— “war president”. He is now Obama the 9/11 avenger, protector of the American people, and the great military master.

    This burnished new image, which is preposterous as the one given to George W. Bush during his reign of terror, grants Obama his own new “political capital”. Two years of flummoxing and failure, wiped out. Attacks from all sides, stopped. Obama has a political weapon to fend off attacks from the right-wing. They can no longer attack Obama for being weak on foreign policy. At the same time, Obama’s corporate liberals (who care only about gaining political points on the Republicans) can return to deluding themselves about Obama’s populism, appeal and effectiveness, despite two years of absolute failure and purposely broken campaign promises. With one stroke, Obama is being handed the 2012 election.

    Suddenly, Obama is not only just as “great” as Bush, but an even “cooler customer”, who singlehandedly ordered and carried out a covert operation that Bush/Cheney could not.

    (This writer had expected the “I Killed Osama” prize to be granted to Bush/Cheney. Apparently, their handling of Iraq/Afghanistan did not earn them the permission.)

    What real objectives will be met with this new propaganda? As noted by*Paul Craig Roberts:

    “My initial interpretation of the faked bin Laden death was that Obama needed closure of the Afghan war and occupation in order to deal with the*USbudget deficit.* Subsequent statements from Obama regime officials suggest that the agenda might be to give Americans a piece of war victory in order to boost their lagging enthusiasm. The military/security complex will become richer and more powerful, and Americans will be rewarded with vicarious pleasure in victory over enemies.”

    Just as the Nixon administration declared a false “victory” in aborting the disastrous war in*Vietnam, Obama can declare a similar “mission accomplished” with his “Osama Kill”. This will allow the administration to redeploying forces from*Afghanistan*to elsewhere in the region.*Pakistan,*Saudi Arabia*and other critical oil-related geography remain in US cross-hairs. The new image of Obama the “heroic anti-terrorist” will convince at least some international leaders to cooperate with the administration. The mass resistance to the US-backed regimes in the Middle East, Africa and*Central Asia*will be at least partially neutered.

    The CIA, soon to be under the command of Iraq/Afghanistan war criminal David Petraeus, is also given a new green light to continue their “war on terrorism” atrocities. This massive criminal mafia is viewed as a heroic protector of*America.

    A redeployment of forces back to the*US*is long overdue, for the continued buildup of*“Obama’s Animal Farm” within US borders. The militarization of the*US*homeland will be ratcheted up, in order to stop domestic unrest, union protests, and popular responses to the*continuing collapse of the US economy.

    “Al-Qaeda”, under new leadership, will be continue to be unleashed. The next phase of the CIA deception is likely to involve the legend of jihadists avenging Osama bin Laden, including, if necessary, “new 9/11s”.The so-called Al-Qaeda number two man, Ayman al-Zawahiri, who himself has “died” multiple times, will be the new boogeyman, along with other recently named*“operational chiefs” such as Adnan Shukrijumah.

    The final atrocity

    To add a grotesque and sickening final insult, the swaggering Barack Obama will grandstand at*New York’s Ground Zero, in a staged celebration of a fictional murder, on the hallowed ground where thousands of people actually died at the hands of the*US*government and its covert operatives.

    Obama even invited George W. Bush to share his “victory lap”.

    This act of exploitation will dispel all illusions about the criminal nature of this liar who has done Bush/Cheney one better by stooping even lower into the depths of depravity.

    The original Big Lie gets its bookend Big Lie.


Page 9 of 10 First ... 78910 Last

Similar Threads

  1. Is Osama Bin Laden dead or alive?
    By Unhypnotized in forum World News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 11th, 2010, 02:42 PM
  2. Limbaugh Admits the Obvious: Osama bin Laden is Dead
    By Unhypnotized in forum Alternative News / Media
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 1st, 2009, 08:06 PM

Tags for this Thread