Oliver Stone: Obama is a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing

hobbit

New member
Note, tale should be in quotes as I meant it as a play on words, or spelling rather.

I thought You were saying that Obama has a tale( tail)
I wouldn't have been shocked.
Though there is a tale to tell about where Obama origonates from.
Test tube comes to mind?
hobbit
 

Pat M's friend

New member
I thought You were saying that Obama has a tale( tail)
I wouldn't have been shocked.
Though there is a tale to tell about where Obama origonates from.
Test tube comes to mind?
hobbit

The play is meant as a double meaning of sorts. A tail as in chasing one's tail, or "hot on someone's tail on the trail of a story" as a reporter would chance a subject's tail to maybe redefine the person's future legacy perhaps, and the tale retold would be the legacy in question. The latter being most important to anyone who is high profile. For the sake of the rep of the family name and all that. The value in it for instance would be to promote career opportunities for the offspring. Every family patriarch is concerned with such matters.
 

Pat M's friend

New member
Hey, hobbit, a tid bit morsel to feed the mind. "- many authors quote secondary, tertiary or post-tertiary sources who have themselves misrepresented the original observations." In context Hundredth monkey effect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ideas evolve as do any rumors which is a seed of an idea after all. The very idea of seeding a popular lie is for it to take on a life of its own. To harvest its fruit once it has matured. Reaping the rewards of success, profit.
 

100th Monkey

New member
Remember MSM feed us controlled information! Wikipedia is edited by ANY person with internet access, and most of the people editing the Wikipedia are MSM journalists MOLDING the information to fit an agenda.

Main stream science information is controlled as well, and so are the scientists. When the source of information are places like Wikipedia, you are sourcing just another controlled source.

This is biased information put there to edit your reality and all your left with is a just another belief system, leavening you to feel small and insignificant.

So what constitutes a reliable source? Nothing!

Logic and facts are illusions!

Pat M you seem to be locked in your left brain.
 
Last edited:

Rehmat

New member
Oliver Stone, though Jewish - has been critical of the Zionist entity - therefore, he was designated "antisemite" by the Jewish Lobby in 2010. Last year, his son Sean Stone 28 did even a worse antisemitic thing - he converted to Shia Islam in Tehran.

Lobby: ‘Why Oliver Stone
 

Pat M's friend

New member
Remember MSM feed us controlled information! Wikipedia is edited by ANY person with internet access, and most of the people editing the Wikipedia are MSM journalists MOLDING the information to fit an agenda.

Main stream science information is controlled as well, and so are the scientists. When the source of information are places like Wikipedia, you are sourcing just another controlled source.

This is biased information put there to edit your reality and all your left with is a just another belief system, leavening you to feel small and insignificant.

So what constitutes a reliable source? Nothing!

Logic and facts are illusions!

Pat M you seem to be locked in your left brain.

One question. Do you consider yourself a reliable source, and why would that be?

Oh and btw I am not dichotomous in my thinking, I'm unbranched. haha
 

Pat M's friend

New member
Are we starting to get off topic a little?

Just a slight bow I think, a mere small digression that's all. Part of a process where the main point being vetted as the subject of the video has a messenger being discussed within the bow making the bow somewhat, but still, relevant as it goes to credibility of the subject.
 

Lady of Light

Administrator
Just a slight bow I think, a mere small digression that's all. Part of a process where the main point being vetted as the subject of the video has a messenger being discussed within the bow making the bow somewhat, but still, relevant as it goes to credibility of the subject.

Fair enough.
 
Top