Linda Brown
New member
"and the list goes on. They are real....to you.
Yes Mikado..... Victoria and the others are indeed very real to me. Linda
Yes Mikado..... Victoria and the others are indeed very real to me. Linda
Do you think that someone in "Morgans" status within the shadow operations is not capable of making his IP show up anywhere, anytime?
Hmmmmmm.
hobbit, from the shires of England.
What's that, Hobbit? A Light beginning to shine through the quagmire?
Exterminator said "How odd... you claim you have trouble reading PM's here like you did when you came to Pegasus. Mikado had issues with a simple email registration and caused a lot of fuss... and when dad talked to you about IP monitoring and how he tracks who hits the site, you pretended you knew nothing about that
Yet now you are here telling us all about hiding your IP trace..."
Hiding my IP Trace? When did I do that. I merely mentioned that people like Morgan do that all the time and you guys know it.....
You are a misleading sarcastic little snip but I am beginning to appreciate the role that you are meant to play here..and hey it might help pay for some real learning
.... is that supposed to be my IP address? And its alright to post it here publically? Tell me where it originates from then?... Now that you are showing how concerned you all are about this.... Linda
"and the list goes on. They are real....to you.
Yes Mikado..... Victoria and the others are indeed very real to me. Linda
How odd... you claim you have trouble reading PM's here like you did when you came to Pegasus. Mikado had issues with a simple email registration and caused a lot of fuss... and when dad talked to you about IP monitoring and how he tracks who hits the site, you pretended you knew nothing about that
Yet now you are here telling us all about hiding your IP trace...
Yeah the thinking members here are going WTF?
No, just shows how IP obsessive You and Your father .......and Mikado are.
You must all have the self same paranoia condition of IP address compulsive disorder???
And just who was in that cuddly wabbit uniform, holding that war criminals hand???
hobbit
I think you might find that then prime minister Tony Blair was the same.And lastly, George Bush was our president and not a war criminal. I am requesting you to tone that talk down. I would not come on here and denigrate your Prime Minister, so please be a bit more polite.
We're one crucial step closer to seeing Tony Blair at The Hague | George Monbiot | Comment is free | The GuardianThe offence is known by two names in international law: the crime of aggression and a crime against peace. It is defined by the Nuremberg principles as the "planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression". This means a war fought for a purpose other than self-defence: in other words outwith articles 33 and 51 of the UN Charter.
That the invasion of Iraq falls into this category looks indisputable. Blair's cabinet ministers knew it, and told him so. His attorney general warned that there were just three ways in which it could be legally justified: "self-defence, humanitarian intervention, or UN security council authorisation. The first and second could not be the base in this case." Blair tried and failed to obtain the third.
We're one crucial step closer to seeing Tony Blair at The Hague | George Monbiot | Comment is free | The GuardianWithout legal justification, the attack on Iraq was an act of mass murder. It caused the deaths of between 100,000 and a million people, and ranks among the greatest crimes the world has ever seen.
I think you might find that then prime minister Tony Blair was the same.
We're one crucial step closer to seeing Tony Blair at The Hague | George Monbiot | Comment is free | The Guardian
We're one crucial step closer to seeing Tony Blair at The Hague | George Monbiot | Comment is free | The Guardian
There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq except the ones British and American troops took there. Without them the legal justification for the war is gone.
The Guardian is not some tabloid. It is a national broadsheet newspaper. If they were libellous in that article then they would be in court, just like the News International people are.
Two British cabinet ministers resigned from the government because their was no legal justification for the war. Think about it. Bush was a war criminal (although the truth is he was just acting on intelligence and advisers information so cannot be solely responsible).