Mikado you said
EG is not Warp Drive.
I sort of like your pictures. I see you copied from Wiki:
Warp drive - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and the fact that you are using a fictional starship to explain your hypothesis.
The picture did not explain my hypothesis. Did you read my first post on this topic? Because I showed that what Brown and Mason Rose said is identical to how warp dive is explained. For example Brown's first patent said it violates Special Relativity and Newtons 3rd law of motion.....Warp drive does too but gets away with it because space is moving not the ship. Brown also said that since it violates Newtons 3rd law of motion you can accurate at an enormous fast rate stop instantly or turn at any angle and will feel nor "G" force or stress at all , as if you we're not moving......Warp drive is explained as that too. Brown believed it creates a gravitational field......from this mason rose said its like surfing on a wave, the positive pole creates a FIELD that is a well ( gravity-potential well) and the negative pole creates a FIELD that is a hill (gravity-potential hill).......again warp drive is explained the same. Brown said it always moves in the direction of the positive pole......so does warp drive. Look at figure 1,2 and 3 do you agree as Brown and Mason did that it creates a gravitational field.
So Mikado it is not the picture that explains my hypothesis, it is the similarities of Electrogravitic propulsion and Warp Drive. If you agree that the positive charge creates a gravity-potential well and the negative charge creates a gravity-potential hill then it to should follow warp drive since warp drive is a gravity propulsion......I
have told you this a thousand of time mikado the field does create a gravitational field but ELECTRICAL in nature meaning an electrical gravitational field (Electrogravity) because if it did create a real gravity field it would attract mass which does not happen so the this gravitational field has to be electrical in nature so it still affect charge......if this is the case then it should be able to warp space since its a gravitational field but electrical in nature so it will warp space and thus can be similar to warp drive but electrical in nature a electrowarp drive.
Mikado......There is something in Main stream science that is predicted by General Relativity and has been tested by NASA which is gravitoelectric, gravitomagnetic, and gravitoelectromagnetic in which mass creates an electrical, magnetic or electromagnetic field but is gravitational in nature, these field effect mass not charge so it has to be gravitational in nature. The equations are identical to Maxwells equations.......then shouldn't it be possible for a magnetic and electric charge creates a gravitational field but is either magnetic, electric or electromagnetic in nature which would be Magnetogravity, Electrogravity, electromagnetogravity which would follow Einstein's equations thus warp space.
P.S. mikado figure 1 which I put in my first post which is the Alcubierre drive which is a warp drive. It is called that after the physicist who was the first to develop a mathematical equation and a theory to show that warp drive can exist by using General Relativity. -dcooper