" In other words, his actions must have been given to him as a directive and the only individual capable of doing that would have been a Psychiatrist.
Consider..... that it might have been someone who could " direct him" ... and that doesn't have to be a psychiatrist in his circle. What if.... the directive could be " aimed" at him.... and he would recieve it because of his mental state and perhaps because he had been carefully chosen for this particular reception? Consider what a horrible weapon this might be....and if it was used in this way... that the people who may be privy to it.... are the worlds greatest threat. Consider that it might have been just a terrible experiment which unfortunately was all too successful............
If it was........ it won't be the last. Just a passing thought..... Linda
Ianchris... you said "That is scary, because it would explain all the funding being pumped into "Dream Research
Can you point out some of this "funding" and who might be behind it?
Linda
Thats an easy thing to say... Blame " The Government"
Blame Freemasons.
Point is.... if this was being done by a negative and very secretive group you would NEVER get a handle on who they are or how they are operating.
My argument exactly, except I finish the thought by saying, the only way one would become enlightened to the operative strategies of an ultra secret organization working to destroy the human race, essentially, would be through divine intervention. The only entity in the universe that is truly all knowing is the "God" whatever that may be. So the only way someone would become aware of this highly protected information, would be if the "God" communicated it to them in some way. Whoever the "God" chooses to receive the message, they must be completely incorruptible because the information would be heavily weighed with temptation and power and the wrong hands, it would be lost at the very least or catastrophic at the very most.
I think that you are too young to remember the Cuban Missile Crisis..... you say that we may be at the " bottom" now and the only way is up but I want to remind you that we are far from the bottom that we might have had in the past..... all it would have taken would have been one man to make a mistake.... to push the button then and we all would have been suffering today. Those of us who remained alive. Consider for a moment what our present might have been.
By "bottom" I was referring to 20 innocent children being massacred in order to create "zeitgeist" as the vehicle in moving an sinister agenda forward. You keep ignoring the unarguable fact of how I gave the warning of Sandy Hook two months before it happened. I'll follow-up with this later in the appropriate category.
So we are in a far better place... hovering now on the borderland of great advances. I agree that there is a great " coming together" happening. I believe that thousands and thousands are feeling it as it happens.
I like your word ... Pollyannic. Why not. Declare yourself.... put your chips on the table. Its a high stakes game. Linda
You responded well I think but in a color that is difficult for some to see ( THAT fits the conversation in an odd way, doesn't it? ) So I am going to reprint your colored response here.
My argument exactly, except I finish the thought by saying, the only way one would become enlightened to the operative strategies of an ultra secret organization working to destroy the human race, essentially, would be through divine intervention. The only entity in the universe that is truly all knowing is the "God" whatever that may be. So the only way someone would become aware of this highly protected information, would be if the "God" communicated it to them in some way. Whoever the "God" chooses to receive the message, they must be completely incorruptible because the information would be heavily weighed with temptation and power and the wrong hands, it would be lost at the very least or catastrophic at the very most.
How do you think that " God " would communicate with them?(
I am leaving each interpretation of "GOD" to each person reading this...)
If we were " communicating" with a " higher intelligence" can we just agree to call it the same thing without all of the trappings that have developed around " Gods"?....
what if.... a higher intelligence was communicating to us for our better good ( all the time realizing that they are not alone in this.... and there is a built in black force too....) Then it becomes our choice doesn't it? Which " intelligence " to listen to?
Isn't that what this has been about all along? Our ability ( not just ability.... our right....) to choose between?
Linda
And what I have said above is an age old philosophical argument. Men have been talking about the battle between Good and Evil since Zoroaster....
The difference is.... that it is becoming more and more important to our particular age . The threshold is being reached.g
I believe that we will not be able to step forward before this is recognized........ and I hope... resolved......... Like I said.... its a very high stakes game. Its EVERYTHING. There is no rule that the human race can not just be replaced by another life form that might do a better job...
Don't worry about Mother Earth... She will be just fine. Its really a matter of whether man kind will be a positive experiment..... and will be allowed to go beyond or will just be relegated to an interesting process... that didn't pan out. Linda
I have a response to you that needs to go here before you go shifting threads. It has something to do with faces in the future or messiahs or whatever... You had said in response to me
"By "bottom" I was referring to 20 innocent children being massacred in order to create "zeitgeist" as the vehicle in moving an sinister agenda forward. You keep ignoring the unarguable fact of how I gave the warning of Sandy Hook two months before it happened. I'll follow-up with this later in the appropriate category.I keep ignoring the unarguable fact of how YOU gave the warning of Sandy Hook two months before it happened? Are you taking CREDIT then for knowing such an massacre was going to happen.?... is that what you are being bold enough to do here?. OK... if that is the case..... and you knew ahead of time..... that you knew about Sandy Hook.... why didn't you take the responsibility to STOP it.
Oh.... Now suddenly you will say.... "but I didn't know the specifics.... only the generalities." Then SIR... You did not know about Sandy Hook at all. And this is all grandstanding on your part. If you had known specifically you would have found a way to stop it.
Such things happen all the time. And no one ever knows about it..... someone snags the key from a car that a mass murderer is planning on using to drive to a Mall..he is well armed.... he has it all planned out...he is going to shoot as many as he can.... a voice in his head is instructing him...... but the keys are suddenly gone..... so perhaps... he just turns the gun on himself.
Of course THAT is just reported as a random suicide...... that the future has been " nudged".... that many lives have been saved is never recognized.....
So I say to you again.... if you are the angel that you have been saying that you are..... Why didn't you actually do your job?
Linda
So I say to you again.... if you are the angel that you have been saying that you are..... Why didn't you actually do your job?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?