The godfather of global warming lowers the boom on climate change hysteria

"Two months ago, James Lovelock, the godfather of global warming, gave a startling interview to msnbc.com in which he acknowledged he had been unduly “alarmist” about climate change. The implications were extraordinary. Lovelock is a world-renowned scientist and environmentalist whose Gaia theory — that the Earth operates as a single, living organism — has had a profound impact on the development of global warming theory....

Lovelock blasted greens for treating global warming like a religion.

“It just so happens that the green religion is now taking over from the Christian religion,” Lovelock observed. “I don’t think people have noticed that, but it’s got all the sort of terms that religions use … The greens use guilt. That just shows how religious greens are. You can’t win people round by saying they are guilty for putting (carbon dioxide) in the air.”

Read the full article here.

Yeah but this didn't make front page news so they'll continue with their plan to demonize carbon as scheduled.

You are wrong. Climate change, or "global warming" as you call it, is real. Mainstream, unbiased science has proved this countless times. Sure, the likes of Al Gore exaggerate and we should not treat climate change like a religion. However, we also should not treat (false) conspiracies like a religion.

cyclictroll said:

You are wrong. Climate change, or "global warming" as you call it, is real. Mainstream, unbiased science has proved this countless times. Sure, the likes of Al Gore exaggerate and we should not treat climate change like a religion. However, we also should not treat (false) conspiracies like a religion.

Click to expand...

How can you honestly say that global warming has been proven countless times? It was all faked. THAT'S been proven COUNTLESS TIMES!

Either you are ignorant of the real world, or you are simply a TROLL come here to cause trouble.

All you do is go find the leaked global warming e-mails, the global warming scientists at IPCC were out to pull the wool over the world eyes and fake the data. So yeah global warming has been proven with FAKE DATA. In other words global warming is NOT real.

here is one of the emails:

From: Phil Jones
To: ray bradley ,mann@xxxxxxxxx,mhughes@xxxxxxx, mhughes@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@xxxxxx,t.osborn@xxxxxxxxxDear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or
first thing tomorrow. I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.

Click to expand...

Hide the Decline:

Read more on this here:
https://unhypnotize.com/global-warm...ails-evidence-collusion-among-scientists.html

cyclictroll if you didn't know about the "Hide the Decline: emails, now you do, if you did and still think it's real then you are a disinfo agent:

Here are links to threads on how a disinfo agent conduct a campaign:

https://unhypnotize.com/articles-ne...tion-misdirection-control-internet-forum.html

https://unhypnotize.com/articles-newsletters/73655-eight-traits-disinformationalist.html

https://unhypnotize.com/articles-newsletters/73656-25-rules-disinformation.html

I would also like to point everyone to this thread:

https://unhypnotize.com/mind-contro...hey-real-paid-internet-shills-confession.html

....if you read these threads you will be able to see right through what these trolls and disinfo agents are trying to do. Feel free to quote what rule(s) they fall under.

Global warming is real. Period.

...but is "man made" Global warming real?

Well, what explains climate change then? Also, what do you mean by man made?