New member
Is there a need for it? Mean in the present, past, future as well.

Unsure on this. Found that in the US its mostly political, especially with abortion, etc along those lines. Instead of etc subjects as well.


New member
There was a need for the NOW movement at one point. I don't know how much they are needed today. Frankly, they went overboard, but then again, maybe they had to just to wake people up.


New member
Femenism used to be "Rights equal to men and women", now it's just a bunch of women screaming about oppression that isn't there, complaints about things that don't matter, and thinking that they are entitled to more rights than men which is the exact opposite of the situation.


New member
Wren, you and I seem to be disagreeing on a lot of things here. While I'm not a fan per se of what I'll call the feminist uprising, the points are often valid.


New member
i beleive in equality for all, but then that should equate that women should do the exact same work as men to recieve those rights. you cannot say equal rights and then pick and choose which rights you want. Yes men and women are different, men cannot have babies but they do supply the sperm that helps 'make' babies. should that mean then that men cannot stay at home for the 1st year or so to raise their child as the child didn't 'grow' inside them? same as with work. no matter how hard we want to make everything equal in the workplace, there are some things men and women cannot do that equates to 'real' equality in the workplace. Even recently in the pension age being risen in the UK, women are up in arams about them being told they must work until they're 65... well you want equality...that's the small price you have to pay.

Before somebody starts saying this is an anti-feminsit rehetoric (it isn't). To have equal rights we must be able to do EVERYTHING EQUALLY. We cannot thus 100% equality cannot occur.


New member
Look into Henry Makow

"Men and women are the victims of a cruel hoax. They are taught that sexual differences are "socially conditioned." Ironically this lie is the actual "social conditioning". Sexual differences are inborn. For example, males have ten times the level of testosterone as women, and this determines their willingness to take risks, etc. Sex roles express natural differences and form the spice of life.

Feminism's Marxist principles of "equality" do not apply to loving heterosexual relationships and are in fact toxic. As I often say, heterosexual marriage is based on the exchange of female worldly power for male love. Equal power neuters both sexes.

Our leaders are accomplices to this monstrous hoax. Behind them are the private central bankers who print our currency in the form of a debt to them. They need a world government so no country can default on it. They need a dictatorship so the people cannot end this scam. They need to stunt our natural development by fostering gender confusion so we can be controlled.

The elitists present women's liberation as if a cherished housewife were the same as a concentration camp inmate. They present this vicious psychological assault as "progress," when in fact it is subversion on a grand scale.

Ladies, where do you think feminism came from? It was organized by the US Communist Party, the CIA and the elite media, all instruments of the central bankers. It is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.

This weekend yet another movie opens about a woman who is a violent killer. "Domino" is the story of a female bounty hunter. The real-life inspiration for this story Domino Harvey died recently of a drug overdose or murder. No wonder young women are confused! Where do they see wives and mothers presented in a positive light? Women are always harried, arguing with men and running off to work.

I get email from feminists who say my articles are "hurtful." It's eerie how they all use that word and repeat the party line. I think it's "hurtful" that the super rich want to take the place of God and nature and enslave humanity. But these feminists don't get it. They don't get "A"'s for connecting feminism with the Rockefellers, Sept. 11 and Iraq, i.e. NWO Central Banker Dictatorship.

Feminism is designed to make women feel unworthy for devoting their lives to the people they love. It forces them out of the house where their employers can control them. It forces infants into joyless day cares subject to conditioning and who-knows-what-else .

I would never stand between anyone and their idea of fulfillment. But ladies, don't be so gullible! You're being defrauded of a lifetime of love. Have your careers later but don't forfeit your femininity and your chance to have a family. "



Feminism, our official gender ideology, masquerades as a movement for women's rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are "socially constructed" to oppress them.

Feminism is elite social engineering designed to destroy gender identity by making women masculine and men feminine. Increasingly heterosexuals are conditioned to behave like homosexuals who generally don't marry and have children. Courtship and monogamy are being replaced by sexual promiscuity, prophesied in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.

The Rockefellers and Rothschilds created feminism to poison male-female relations (divide and conquer.) Their twin objectives are depopulation and totalitarian world government. Why? These bankers create money out of nothing and think they are God.

"Cruel Hoax" shows the connection between feminism, Communism and 9-11. It examines male-female relations and shows how we can take back our heterosexuality".