Lady of Light is correct I think in sensing the Russian influence.
Linda
What I see with Mikados response here is a person who wants to be the expert on Townsend Browns work.... and the only way that he can get there is to cripple the biographer and the mans daughter. Its a disgusting display of egomania.
And it won't work.
Linda
Letter from AM said:PM from AM - Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 5:42 PM
It's really that simple. And please let the "informed sources" spare us the crap how they had to lie their whole lives to stay alive. In this case it is a logical fallacy. Why?
A. If the situation was truly dangerous, then the references to Cornillon and Bergier could be omitted until proper safety for all the involved parties could be provided.
B. How can you compare such a situation with waging war behind the German lines in 1944?
C. If indeed it was so dangerous why references were made at all? Anyone suitably informed could determine the truth. Do you think that such person would really be stopped by this Cornillon/Cornellion charade?
Finally, can you imagine how such silly games undermine the credibility of the author?
And then our Mr. Twigsnapper wants me to write!? Yes? So that I too will be fed false information and played like a fiddle? For what? A great future somewhere in the hazy mists of after-tomorrow?
Sir, as far as I am concerned the world can go to hell as long my ass is warm and safe. Mao Zedong once beautifully rephrased Sunzi's Bingfa (The Art of War): "Don't start battles you cannot win. Don't wage wars in which you cannot attain victory. And if you find yourself cofronted with a superior enemy then there is really just one thing you can do: Fuck off - run as quickly as the legs carry you."
Why do you think Mao was so successful when fighting the Japanese? Because he never attacked when they came in overwhelming numbers and with full power.
In my country we have a saying: "The chest of a hero, the brain of an idiot."
I am still toying with the thought of writting something. Something about Dr. Kitselman, but I am not the docile, old Mr. Schatzkin. If the Irish fiddler and his pals think they can play me, then they really needn't bother and can stick their fiddles along with the bow and string up their asses.
Last, but not least I can just cynically say: "Since everything is going to be all-right in the end, my participation is not needed. Nor the texts I gathered."
Mr. Trickfox is a bright bulb - ergo he doesn't need anything. Why then ask me?
As for the technical advice about sigils that I asked you, it was of subsidiary nature. Rest assured I will not ask anything neither of you, nor of anyone else.
Regards,
AM
P. S. Forgive me the above profanities, but sometimes it has to be phrased like it is.
You are such a twit, as usual. In what manner have I crippled the biographer? Have you ever had any writing classes at the college level?
Paul was in the process of performing his own "due-diligence" during the better part of 2008. You know, but I am sure you won't admit it, that in the summer of '08, Paul was finding it difficult to be able to cross check the facts that Morgan and twigsnapper had given and that you were verifying or just didn't plain know. That is not enough. A biographer needs to check the facts otherwise, it is revisionist.( Show me the Naval records that were incorrect, the information from town hall of Zanesville, all of the really valuable information that Paul found and used in his book and that I helped him with. You can't wipe all of that away by just calling it " revisionist" because it doesn't line up with your own agenda[/COLOR
It was in August of '08 that the seeds of the meeting in Huntingdon were sown, you know that as well. Paul had severe doubts as to the sources. He expressed the fortuitous similarities between Morgans' illness and his own Father's.( what does that have to do with anything Mikado. Make sense.) He expressed how he felt "someone" used this information to achieve an emotional gestalt. In fact, here is a PM from AM at the same time Paul was going through his ramp up to the "epic fail".
The fact that there were others stirring Pauls pot is really not an issue here.I suspect that there are alot of "players" here. Keeping this information silent has worked for alot of people and organizations. You were STILL one of the major people involved in directly meeting with him just weeks before he finally suffered his " Epic Fail" and no amount of hiding behind rocks is going to change that.
Here is a thought - perhaps AM and Paul were talking and that AM was the impetus that resulted in "epic fail"? Perhaps he was. I don't know who AM was and neither do you Mikado. I have no idea what camp he was working for. It sure wasnd't a positive force. Just read the words that he picked to use.The undertone in AM's message is nothing more than begging for a "due-diligence". ( As I look at it... he was very angry at Mr. Twigsnapper for suggesting that he use his talents in a positive manner. Finally Mr. Twigsnapper gave up on him and " turned him out." Too bad because he was talented.)
As to egomania, geez, look at who has a thread dedicated to just her. Look at all your postings that you have ever made...and you talk of substance? Thats for others to decide Mikado... over twelve thousand readers have noted this site. Let them decide what has substance or not. You can't stand that it has gotten that kind of attention, can you?As to the many posts on the previous pages I will offer this comment....
I valued my anonymity and you took that away on the Cosmic-Token by posting personal information that resulted in the harassment of my parents and two individuals showing up on my doorstep. No one knew my name Linda. YOU took away my anonymity and you have the unmitigated gall to act or state in any manner that I broke my own anonymity out of ego? Yes, I do/ because I dond't think that you can control yourself. (Your life will never be the same Mikado and you have done that to yourself.are such a revisionist ass. And yes, you are the petulant little girl when someone questions her, she then goes into a tantrum. Whether that be on the floor kicking and pounding or be it twisting and distorting facts as an adult, it is still the same and there are those that can see it.
There you go with the "petulant little girl" thought Mikado. Whats the matter? Afraid to deal with a full grown woman?
Have a nice day!
Mikado
PS: and of course you are correct...I haven't done a damn thing and all I wanted was for you to show up here for the demonstration so that you could broadcast it as you have been doing ( is that what you thought I would do for you? Why would I do anything for you Mikado?You insult me thoroughly and constantly and then expect me to go out of my way for you? And you call me delusional???? You can be very funny. but then the difference is...you never showed up. Ask yourself this, what would you have done if you did? I don't believe that you ever had anything to show anybody Mikado. It would have been a wasted trip and I have stopped doing that kind of thing. The trips that I make now to meet people have to count.And one last question....Answer my question as to why you felt it necessary to bring up Kim' son and the bearing it has on this thread or any other topic? Or are you not accountable for your actions as a child would be?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?