Supreme Court Appears Split by Infant Vaccination Case

[Unhypnotized]

Tuesday 12 October 2010
by: Warren Richey

This article states:

"Tens of millions of childhood vaccine doses are safely administered each year in the US. "

Vaccines cause all kinds of disease, the damage is not attributed to vaccines and often does not show up immediately, sometime taking years and so the causes go unrecognized or misdiagnosed. If you read the quote closly, it says the vaccine is safely administered; NOT that the vaccine it self is safe, just they injected it in a safe manner. However it is worded to imply the they are safe.

Tuesday 12 October 2010
by: Warren Richey | The Christian Science Monitor | Report

Washington - The US Supreme Court on Tuesday heard argument in a dispute over whether the family of an infant who suffered a severe reaction to a vaccine can sue the drug maker for allegedly failing to replace an older version of the vaccine with a safer version.

At issue is whether Russell and Robalee Bruesewitz can sue drug maker Wyeth for allegedly selling an unsafe product that caused their healthy six-month-old daughter, Hannah, to suffer seizures that left her developmentally impaired.

The high court appears to be split on the case, with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg among those favoring the parents' lawsuit and Chief Justice John Roberts among those leaning toward the drug maker....

Continue to read here:
t r u t h o u t | Supreme Court Appears Split by Infant Vaccination Case