I need to repeat what you have said here so that I can understand if this is what you actually mean to say "Although, from my understanding every Knight is a Freemason.. I sort of touch on that in my video when I state how consumerism works within a monarchical society.
Its rare these days to be able to find an honest to goodness Knight.... I suppose Sir Richard Branson would qualify.... you then believe him to be a Freemason?
I personally have only met one " Sir".... " Sir William Stephenson" and his wife Lady Mary.... and had the odd experience of going to a local stage production of " Peter Pan" with them and my parents after a really nice dinner experience at Coconut Grove in Florida. They were visiting Dad from their home in Bermuda I think though Dad always referred to the couple as " the Smiths... from Nassau"
So am I to understand then from your conclusions that Sir William was a " dastardly Freemason" because he was knighted by the Queen for his outstanding work in intelligence during World War II.
Some of the things that you have written about Freemasons sound pretty negative....( cannabalism even.... did I read you right?)
I Looked into this mans eyes. I understand that he may have lived occasionally by rules of his own making....and maybe some would not have agreed with his actions... but he kept men like my Dad safe in their work... and if you have read anything at all about him... you might come to the conclusion, as I have...... that he has kept our generation " safe in our beds"
So just make note of my little red flag of protest here on your statement above but please don't stop your conversation. Its really pretty interesting....... though.....on the subject of child molesters, male members and wrongfooted church officials ( isnt that what the Anglican Church called Roman Catholics?) I don't have much to add.
Linda
