New UFO Hunter
Real UFO News Freak
Shock finding as scientists re-analyse soil samples from Seventies Viking lander
Soil samples from Viking 1 lander which visited Mars in 1976 Mathematical analysis shows strong sign of organics Samples had been dismissed as contaminated '99% probability of life' claims one scientist
PUBLISHED: 08:08 GMT, 13 April 2012 | UPDATED: 08:49 GMT, 13 April 2012
In July 1976, the Viking 1 probe touched down on Mars and failed to find traces of life - but now, three decades later, scientists think the experiment was flawed.
VIking 1 did find evidence of extraterrestrial microbes in soil samples from the Red Planet.
Mathematical analysis of the samples concluded that salts in the soil on Mars 'threw off' initial estimates - and that the soil samples show strong evidence of microbial life.
The new analysis looked for 'complexity' in the samples - an indication of life. To the surprise of the scientists, they found it.
'This suggests a robust biological response,' say the researchers, from the University of Siena and California's Keck Institute.
'These analyses support the interpretation that the Viking LR experiment did detect extant microbial life on Mars.'
The reassessment was prompted by the discovery of 'perchlorates' in the soil at the landing site of another Mars lander, Phoenix, in 2008.
The presence of the chemicals in Viking's samples had led scientists to conclude the samples were contaminated.
The scientists behind the experiment remain divided over how conclusive the evidence for life on Mars is.
Christopher McKay of Nasa's Ames Research Centre said, in an interview with Discovery News, 'Finding organics is not evidence of life or evidence of past life. It's just evidence for organics.'
'The ultimate proof is to take a video of a Martian bacteria. They should send a microscope - watch the bacteria move,' said Josheph Miller of USC's Keck School of Medicine.
'On the basis of what we've done so far, I'd say I'm 99 percent sure there's life there.'
Future Mars missions may be able to settle the question. The Viking 1 lander on display at the National Air and Space museum: Did the craft discover evidence of life on Mars?
One forthcoming unmanned mission is the new Mars Science Laboratory rover, called Curiosity, scheduled for launch in November.
The $2.5 billion nuclear-powered machine will land on Mars' surface with a suite of 10 science instruments to try to determine if conditions are favorable for life.
Another key Mars mission is scheduled for 2016. Called the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter, it will carry five science instruments and will study gases in Mars' atmosphere, including methane, for evidence of biological or geological activity.
'The instruments on that atmospheric mission have a factor of 100 to 1,000 increase in sensitivity over what is currently available from Mars orbiters or from ground observations,' said Mark Allen, Ph.D., who is the U.S. project scientist for the 2016 Mars mission.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...#ixzz1s2XDYkce
Soil samples from Viking 1 lander which visited Mars in 1976 Mathematical analysis shows strong sign of organics Samples had been dismissed as contaminated '99% probability of life' claims one scientist
PUBLISHED: 08:08 GMT, 13 April 2012 | UPDATED: 08:49 GMT, 13 April 2012
In July 1976, the Viking 1 probe touched down on Mars and failed to find traces of life - but now, three decades later, scientists think the experiment was flawed.
VIking 1 did find evidence of extraterrestrial microbes in soil samples from the Red Planet.
Mathematical analysis of the samples concluded that salts in the soil on Mars 'threw off' initial estimates - and that the soil samples show strong evidence of microbial life.
The new analysis looked for 'complexity' in the samples - an indication of life. To the surprise of the scientists, they found it.
'This suggests a robust biological response,' say the researchers, from the University of Siena and California's Keck Institute.
'These analyses support the interpretation that the Viking LR experiment did detect extant microbial life on Mars.'
The reassessment was prompted by the discovery of 'perchlorates' in the soil at the landing site of another Mars lander, Phoenix, in 2008.
The presence of the chemicals in Viking's samples had led scientists to conclude the samples were contaminated.
The scientists behind the experiment remain divided over how conclusive the evidence for life on Mars is.
Christopher McKay of Nasa's Ames Research Centre said, in an interview with Discovery News, 'Finding organics is not evidence of life or evidence of past life. It's just evidence for organics.'
'The ultimate proof is to take a video of a Martian bacteria. They should send a microscope - watch the bacteria move,' said Josheph Miller of USC's Keck School of Medicine.
'On the basis of what we've done so far, I'd say I'm 99 percent sure there's life there.'
Future Mars missions may be able to settle the question. The Viking 1 lander on display at the National Air and Space museum: Did the craft discover evidence of life on Mars?
One forthcoming unmanned mission is the new Mars Science Laboratory rover, called Curiosity, scheduled for launch in November.
The $2.5 billion nuclear-powered machine will land on Mars' surface with a suite of 10 science instruments to try to determine if conditions are favorable for life.
Another key Mars mission is scheduled for 2016. Called the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter, it will carry five science instruments and will study gases in Mars' atmosphere, including methane, for evidence of biological or geological activity.
'The instruments on that atmospheric mission have a factor of 100 to 1,000 increase in sensitivity over what is currently available from Mars orbiters or from ground observations,' said Mark Allen, Ph.D., who is the U.S. project scientist for the 2016 Mars mission.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...#ixzz1s2XDYkce