My husband asked me today why in the world I have so much interest in following up on my Dads work...and it was hard to answer him because he really can not see what I do. Perhaps no one else does either.
I happened across something that Langley had messaged on the ttbrown forum ( Paul Schatzkins Forum.) The date was AFTER Paul had quit but some of the members there had encouraged him to keep the Forum up and available though it is locked down for further comments. Langleys posted in March 09 was perhaps the most important but I will leave it to all of you to see the importance of what is going on here.... or not....
I posted this on the cosmic token too so that it won't be lost.
by Linda Brown » Tue May 28, 2013 3:50 am
This is from the old ttbrown forum and from our good companion Langley....
Welcome to the Parallel Universe ? View topic - Lock Down
I wish that Paul had paid better attention to the things that he had to say and I encourage you to read ALL of his message but this is the part that I wanted to point out to everyone.... the most outstanding observation in red....
"On reading the official the Symth report, the official account of the atomic bomb program (Atomic Energy for Military Purposes (The Smyth Report) The Official Report on the Development of the Atomic Bomb Under the Auspices of the United States Government By Henry De Wolf Smyth at
http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/Smyth ... ndex.shtml) the same theme pops up. That the forces are fundamentally ELECTROSTATIC. TT had serious lung problems because of ozone. Ionisation by electricity. Though today the whole thing is thought of in terms of the Nuclear Force, the binding energy and mass conversion, its actually electrostatics. Go back to the OLD nonclemanture - what things were called and why they were calld it, and we find a postive and a negative application of the same deal. Especially when one goes back to what has been said and refenced about neutrons in these forums.
A malleable collective thing formed from sub sub particles seemingly as required. As if the boundary between "this side" and the "other side" is responsive and self stabilising. But capable of unleashing ferocious forces when manipulated brutally or of seemingly to transcend the laws of physics. But that actually an oxymoron. Or something. We dont tell the cosmos what to do. (have a go, see what happens). We have to observe and apply that which has always been.
Its like, huh? Two Donald Campbell's in two Bluebirds on the same Lake Eyre doing the same 400 mph on the same but opposite vectors.
And there was a vanishing point where they met. Just a flash, a twinkle and they were gone from public view.
Which is not say I think TT was involved in the bomb. He wasnt. Now I cant verbalise my feelings on this any better than I have. Im just laying underneath it all looking up and marvelling. I aint gonna drive it any distance at all. Just in case. Ill let someone young and immortal do that.
We live in an expanded singularity. Just beneath what we call reality, there is a field. Everything comes from it. It is the field of the Singularity. But its stretched out. It connects each point with every other point as if it were still a singularity. Had the MED guys "gone the other way", it wouldnt have been a bomb so much as breach in time and space. Hiroshima would have disappeared. No smoke, no flames, no nothing. There, it starts and idles, but no way am I taking out on the street. Id be tempted to lay serious rubber."Such serious and important observations and I particularly liked this
"
Greetings Radomir! Hope you and yours are well. Not bad, still trying to get my head around history. And this vague and queasy feeling that the guys into fission had/have things in negative. While Brown had them in positive
Linda
Greetings to you too Radomir... from another time but the thoughts are the same....
*****************************************************************************
This message from Langley was typed out March 25, 2009... after Paul had closed down the Forum and then been asked to AT LEAST leave it up and make it available for future investigators. Paul had given up and said that there was nothing to the work of Townsend Brown because HE COULDN'T SEE IT. But if you read the implications of what Langley says here.... perhaps its a very good thing that people don't actually see anything quite yet....until they are prepared for the responsibility........
Linda Brown