Linda Brown – Daughter of Thomas Townsend Brown (TTB)

Earlier I mentioned my upset with Fred over what he had said at a very confidential meeting in Vegas. Since it has been so thoroughly mentioned now I can bring it up again..... so that you can see that Fred himself backed my words up with his further correspondence . He had been confiding to a friend of his in Ohio and strangely enough I guess that he didn't realize that she and I had been talking too.... about a situation that was not at all connected with what he told her. She had fallen in love with a fellow that was not exactly returning her emotions. It was rough on her... as love sometimes can be to those who care so much. Anyway..... since this has been called a " soap opera" we might as well enjoy all of the elements of it..


This is from the HUT......

http://www.ttownsendbrown.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=1067&sid=bd406b5655a46a510d56b620e22617f0
Karen has posted a protest to something that Fred had written and this was my response back to her.
"by Linda Brown » Fri Nov 02, 2012 6:29 pm

Hi Karen!

First of all.... how did you fare during the storm. I hoped that it has petered out pretty much by the time the remnants of the storm went past you all... but still... its nice to see that you have power.

This statement was written by Fred when he was trying to explain some of the things to get himself out of the jam that he had found himself in with me. One of the things was that during a phone conversation with you.... He had mentioned that he had met " Morgan" and talked to him while we were all in Vegas. Of course at the time it was meant that all that was extremely confidential. For him to mention it to you was a gross mistake and showed that he could not be trusted with sensitive information. Its not that I would not have trusted YOU myself but the fact is that he should NEVER have mentioned that meeting to anybody.

Mikado and others skoff at the idea but Freds phone call to you was in fact monitored and the contents reported to me ( and I am sure to others). Thats what really started the ball rolling as far as not trusting Fred.... how could I possibly? And then Fred later wrote this to explain himself....which is what you quoted in your opening statement.

I spoke to KarenAnn23 on the telephone and did mention that I met Morgan. Based on the fact that Karen no longer speaks to me, and the fact that SHE made the call to Linda, speaks volumes in itself. There was no Juan/Carl or Twigsnapper that intervened.

Its funny that he would say that there was no Juan who intervened because thats exactly who i GOT the initial revealing phone call from. And the thing that I remembered most about that upsetting call was that he had added " Linda, this is just the tip of the iceberg". People like that don't go further into explanations and I didn't even bother to ask.... but thats when I started hitting the panic buttons about Fred and Mikado doing things behind my back. All that should be recorded here on the HUT but over two thousand messages were erased and I am sure anything incriminating went along with them. I find it funny that Fred would think that he would even know who it was who intervened. Just how would he know that? A couple of kids playing around in a grown up world I think. No wonder they come off looking ridiculous.

In the months that have followed Mikado has launched himself on this active disinformation program spouting that "Morgan" doesns't exist, Twigsnapper doesn't exist.... that they are all somehow a figment of my own overactive imagination! I have to kind of smile at that. They sure heft alot of weight around here to be figments......handsome figments too by the way.

You and I did talk... as you said..... but I think by then I already knew what had transpired and as I recall we talked more about the romantic situtation that you found yourself in and not Fred or Mikado that much. Its strange to me that both of them think that they are the only people worth talking about I guess but the fact is that they were not even really a consideration.

I hope that your heart has healed by the way.

Its tough being in love with a Good-Bye Man.... <g>

I am putting a copy of this message on the Cosmic-Token for safe keeping because I think that it will probably disappear as soon as Mikado notices it. You are welcomed to join us again there or on the Resolute. We miss our cabin girl!!! Best to you!!! Linda
****************************************************************************



So thats the latest dose of the soap opera that we all seem to be living through. Karen, if you are reading this, I hope that you are well.

Of course Mikado had much more to say about her response... but its probably not worth repeating.

Linda
 
Last edited:
And this message still stands to you Karen. No matter what Mikado or Fred have to say.

http://www.ttownsendbrown.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=1067&sid=bd406b5655a46a510d56b620e22617f0

" Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:48 pm

I can not speak for the crowd here on the HUT but I want you to understand Karen that you were in NO WAY responsible for anything that happened. You were on the recieving end of information that was not supposed to be given out. No fault of yours whatsoever.

If anyone is trying to make you feel badly because of any part that you may have played by being at the same place at the same time.... then shed those feelings like water off a ducks back because its not right that you feel badly over mistakes that others have made.

You have nothing to apologize for or feel sorry about. Period.
Linda
********************************************************************
 
Last edited:
This was a recent exchange on the cosmic-token which I would like to share with all of you....

? View topic - "Seeking your Permission"

by Linda Brown » Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:21 pm

I have recently gotten a very interesting packet of information from someone who entitled his Email to me..... SEEKING YOUR PERMISSION.... He wanted my input on a project that he is planning to publish sometime in the future.

I told him that some of my interaction with him would be posted here on the Cosmic-Token and this is part of that effort now.....

"Dear Sir.....

You said

[i]We want to make sure his work is properly covered in our book and future generations will not forget him as the man who invented the UFO technology[/i].

And of course I want you to know that I appreciate your effort so much and will do everything that I can to help you...Part of that would be my responsibility to see that your book has as much solid information as it possibly can have.

So here is the rest of my first message to you..... hopefully you will read it.... if you don't want to respond here you know that we have another line of communication.....but we might as well talk here so that everyone can see what we are saying!

To the person who recently contacted me...... Hello.... its very nice to meet you.

When you wrote

"There's one thing we probably need to let you know. Cosmic-token.com is not exactly "secure". There are people monitoring the information at this and other similar web sites to see who knows what, and to figure out the locations of individuals and groups who might be getting close to the truth. "

Absolutely! But this is a reality that I have accepted since I was a teenager working with my Dad in his various labs. You must also understand that no amount of "hiding" is effective when it comes to this subject. The best thing that I have found for me is to be in "Plain sight". And I have dedicated myself in that direction.

And because of that I have decided to answer some of your questions here on this Forum.... realizing of course that you are absolutely right!. There are people carefully monitoring this site and every single keystroke. There is nothing new about that. Some are friends, some are enemies. To think differently would be to be ignorant of what the importance of this subject is.... to our government and various other groups. That is a fact of life regarding the work of Townsend Brown. I was once told that every single intelligence agency IN THE WORLD would be monitoring what is said here , including the Vatican. I laughed at that at first but it was nervous laughter, and now I realize that he was speaking the absolute truth.

You wrote :

And knowing that your father has had more than his fair share of bad luck in not getting his business of electrokinetic devices off the ground in a big way tells us that it is most likely certain individuals in the U.S. Government are fully aware of the implications of your father's work to UFOs, so much so that I think the U.S. Government has a lot to answer for and probably should compensate your family for the loss of income in not being able to fully commercialise your father's patents.

I have probably never written this on this Forum but you have presented me with the opportunity here.
First of all.... though many people probably do have " alot to answer for".... its a waste of time hoping that any of them will admit to any of their participation at all. EVER. That just doesn't happen.

And you should understand that I have no interest at all in " commercialising" my Dads patents. The age for that passed when all of them lapsed into public domain. And I have no interest or assoications in any business arrangements that would do that.

I am aware that there are billions ( And I mean that with the B) to be made from this new technology. There are those now working all over the world who will lend their special talent and energy to it and I have no doubt at all that the work that has been supressed for so long will soon " Bubble" to the surface. Those wonderful efforts will always have my full support.

The effort that you are making right now speaks to this. My reaction to you is also what Dad would have told you. " GO FORTH".... and certainly any way that I can help you, I will.

My response here is part of that I believe.

But to be able to do are attempting to do you have to know what the real story of my Dads path was and the reasons that he did what he did.
When you say that he had his share of " bad luck" I would like you to know that what looked like " bad luck" to you, I believe, was a carefully drawn out plan to delay the introduction of this technology to a safer time. The age of the Cold War and the missile race with the Russians was not good timing for its development. I believe that Dad and those that worked with him effectively delayed its progress and they did that INTENTIONALLY. There was no such thing as " Bad Luck" for him.... though the public might certainly see and believe it to be such. They were meant to believe that.

He was never actually interested in any commercial success.

If you know the story of " The Ionic Breeze" then you will know that it was Dad who handed that technology over to the man who developed it further and placed it in the hands of the Sharper Image.( Even then it was not brought to the publics attention until years after Dads death) Paul Schatzkin wrote about this interaction in the Biography that he wrote about Dad. The unfinished manuscript was published under the name of " Defying Gravity" The Parallel Universe of T. Townsend Brown." Paul had his own reasons for not finishing the book but what he has published is really a valuable piece of research, as far as it goes and his interview with the developer of the Sharper Image " Ionic Breeze fan" is very enlightening.

I am going to post this and I will spend today looking over the material that you sent me. Thank you so much for the enthusiasm that you are bringing to the table....I wish you every success in your venture.

Linda
 
Last edited:
Its amazing to me how your mind works Mikado.

Do you REALLY think that you can control the turn of this subject simply by repeating yourself?
You keep saying that you are simply responding to my claims but you do more than that.
You constantly add your " spin".

Well, thats alright. Everyone has a side to this story.

Everytime you say something you add more and more to it.

In the long run you will uncover your own role in this.

Its not pretty.

But it is a story that is going to be revealed.

Linda


I suppose one could say that the truth is repetitive. As to a role, whatever you say missy.

Any "story" will be nothing more than that....a story. Just as with all the Morgan stories and the "Adventures of Twigsnapper"....stories.

Mikado
 
Last edited:
"If you were to enter a bank with someone and then that someone comes back to the bank and robs it, are you an accomplish? That is what you are attempting in your "simple" question.

Thats what you just wrote Mikado . Maybe you should ask some law enforcement people on that and how they might react to that. Maybe you should check your spelling too. Remember.... you are attempting to be fault free.

Linda

Spelling? Oh so sorry but I am not perfect, that is your interpretation of which you are wrong as usual. Spell check sometimes lets "words" get through.

As to my example, it was a question posed with how you are coming across. And yes, you could be an accomplice. You need to perform a due-diligence on precedent law and see for yourself but then it is so much easier to make things up as you go and stand on the mount proclaiming the validity with no substantiative facts.


Mikado
 
As to all the tripe you have posted above, I will help you remember....again for the umpteenth time.

The final straw that had you removed as an admin from the Hut was when you posted to "everyone" in general about Kim's son. You were slanderous/libelous in your posting. To help put things in perspective, you claimed he died due to drugs and violence to name a few of the things you said.

It was nothing more than a lie and distortion of the facts.

There was no reason to even mention her son. You did it out of pure venom/spitefulness/hate/nastiness which all was a portrayal of your true personality and your lust to be right and always a winner...just as your two classmates said of you. Her son had no bearing on what was taking place and you made a conscious decision, by design, to inflict emotional discomfort to Kim knowing full well the emotional distress she was suffering.

In short, you wanted to hurt. You couldn't argue your point logically and as to truth, you know you can't for at the time, those involved had been involved for years and all had met numerous times in the flesh. You went for a preemptive strike for all the reasons I have mentioned.

You called me pathetic once for doing the due-diligence. Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones and everyone can see who is throwing.

As to anything I have done, you were invited in one of your trips you were claiming to be making last August, to stop by for a presentation of a fully functioning Gravitor. In fact, Rose was invited and so was Paul, both responded and declined but asked to be kept appraised. You never responded to the email...but you sure did post about it. Your antics have been nothing more than to make posts claiming nothing was done. How can you make that claim when you never showed up?

Ever wonder why I disappear and don't respond to all you do say?.....Why indulge the petulant little girl in the pinafore.


Enjoy your holiday with the Gutless Marine. Which before parting, let's get this straight. An email was sent, supposedly by George and was signed "G". It threatened my family. Now really, do you really believe that I think it was George who sent me that email? If it was and he signed it "G", then he really is "gutless" and deserves that title but you and I know who really sent it.

Anyway, as I said, enjoy your holiday with whomever,

Mikado


email said:
----- Original Message -----
From: XXXXX
To: Elizabeth Helen Drake
Cc: Jan L.
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 11:16 AM
Subject: An offer


Linda,

There was a meeting of what has been called Hut B yesterday afternoon via conference and different phone calls. And it was decided as to the following.

On the first weekend of August, specifically the 4th, the final active testing of the Gravitor will commence. Owing to the fact that the underlying foundation is based upon your Father's work, it was decided to offer you the opportunity to observe final experiments of full dynamic testing.

At some point, depending on the success or failure of the experiments, it will become public. Although this may take a bit of time for the compilation of the results, it is, as mentioned, built upon your Fathers' work.

This decision came about in all fairness and is being offered to you and Jan since she is the writer of your memoirs. It will be further extended to the writer of the only known biography written about your Father as was promised.

We look forward to hearing from you,

Mikado, Pladuim et al.
 
As to all the tripe you have posted above, I will help you remember....again for the umpteenth time.

The final straw that had you removed as an admin from the Hut was when you posted to "everyone" in general about Kim's son. You were slanderous/libelous in your posting. To help put things in perspective, you claimed he died due to drugs and violence to name a few of the things you said.

It was nothing more than a lie and distortion of the facts.

There was no reason to even mention her son. You did it out of pure venom/spitefulness/hate/nastiness which all was a portrayal of your true personality and your lust to be right and always a winner...just as your two classmates said of you. Her son had no bearing on what was taking place and you made a conscious decision, by design, to inflict emotional discomfort to Kim knowing full well the emotional distress she was suffering.

In short, you wanted to hurt. You couldn't argue your point logically and as to truth, you know you can't for at the time, those involved had been involved for years and all had met numerous times in the flesh. You went for a preemptive strike for all the reasons I have mentioned.

You called me pathetic once for doing the due-diligence. Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones and everyone can see who is throwing.

As to anything I have done, you were invited in one of your trips you were claiming to be making last August, to stop by for a presentation of a fully functioning Gravitor. In fact, Rose was invited and so was Paul, both responded and declined but asked to be kept appraised. You never responded to the email...but you sure did post about it. Your antics have been nothing more than to make posts claiming nothing was done. How can you make that claim when you never showed up?

Ever wonder why I disappear and don't respond to all you do say?.....Why indulge the petulant little girl in the pinafore.


Enjoy your holiday with the Gutless Marine. Which before parting, let's get this straight. An email was sent, supposedly by George and was signed "G". It threatened my family. Now really, do you really believe that I think it was George who sent me that email? If it was and he signed it "G", then he really is "gutless" and deserves that title but you and I know who really sent it.

Anyway, as I said, enjoy your holiday with whomever,

Mikado

Was Kims son on drugs?
If You are going to throw accusations about postings content, please provide a link to said posting.
My son was heavily into drugs for quite some time, big deal.
I was very concerned for His future, and the consequences involved with the people involved.
It isn't a shame, it is a consequence of the drugs been made available for profit.
.
hobbit
 
The only one talking about Kims son has been Kim herself and Mikado. I have never had any interest at all in talking about him.

Notice how Mikado rattles on about stuff no one else is interested in.

Something SUBSTANTIAL Mikado. Not the same old palavering.

You have this wild hatred of me that you can't seem to supress. Your descriptions are always self referential. Things you accuse me of.... are things you have been doing.

I know who you are Mikado. I am no longer impressed.

And I am planning on having a very good trip Mikado.... talking with people who are actually doing something important.



Linda
 
Last edited:
hobbit said:
Was Kims son on drugs?

No

The only one talking about Kims son has been Kim herself and Mikado. I have never had any interest at all in talking about him.

Notice how Mikado rattles on about stuff no one else is interested in.

Something SUBSTANTIAL Mikado. Not the same old palavering.

You have this wild hatred of me that you can't seem to supress. Your descriptions are always self referential. Things you accuse me of.... are things you have been doing.

I know who you are Mikado. I am no longer impressed.

Linda

I will take a bit of time to address you.

"The only one talking about Kims son has been Kim herself and Mikado. I have never had any interest at all in talking about him."

I believe you have copied a post from Kim in response to you, that was posted by you on the Hut. Your representations are nothing more than twisted truths which are a lie. Her response addressed statements you made and her response was justified at that time. You were wrong then and you are wrong now in bringing it up. To reiterate, her son had no bearing on you, your family, the group, Paul's book, your "memoirs" or anything at all to do with your Father. It is exactly as I said as to what your intent was. Now, as to not having any interest, the facts speak for themselves and a blind man without a cane can see through you.

Notice how Mikado rattles on about stuff no one else is interested in.

Not interested? Perhaps others are not but you brought it up. I am responding to your crap...as usual.

Something SUBSTANTIAL Mikado. Not the same old palavering.

If responding to your post is NOT substantial than your post was not substantial either for my post was addressing what you said.

You have this wild hatred of me that you can't seem to supress. Your descriptions are always self referential. Things you accuse me of.... are things you have been doing.

I do not "hate" you. In fact, there are things about you I miss but at the same time I feel pity for you for you will never know what a true friend is. However, you are the one who keeps bringing my name up. Have I posted anything about you that was not a rebuttal to some nonsense/attack/slander or libel that you began? So refresh this forum as to whom truly has the wild hatred. As to "self-referential", it is a misuse since actions are being referenced that involves others of which you are one.

I know who you are Mikado. I am no longer impressed.

You also stated elsewhere in this forum that you want "no association" with me. Now really Linda, if that were true than why do you insist upon discussing me with untrue statements or revised history?

Maybe it is because you do know who I am for you can't seem to leave me out of your paracosm.

Mikado

PS: how does Dave like the new car...meaning to ask you that.
 
Its amazing to me how your mind works Mikado.

Do you REALLY think that you can control the turn of this subject simply by repeating yourself?
You keep saying that you are simply responding to my claims but you do more than that.
You constantly add your " spin".

Well, thats alright. Everyone has a side to this story.

Everytime you say something you add more and more to it.

In the long run you will uncover your own role in this.

Its not pretty.

But it is a story that is going to be revealed.

Linda

I spotted this reply in my email, let me indulge you.

"Its amazing to me how your mind works Mikado.

Do you REALLY think that you can control the turn of this subject simply by repeating yourself?
You keep saying that you are simply responding to my claims but you do more than that.
You constantly add your " spin"."


The truth is repetitious. I know you might find that difficult to believe since you don't say too much of that but it is true non the less. As to my "spin", I can back up all that I have said and will do so in a court of law, remember, you have the attorney on retainer so if you want to see the facts, that is where you will get them.

"Well, thats alright. Everyone has a side to this story."

This statement is your way of easing your own conscious. Please don't project on me. The truth is the truth.

"In the long run you will uncover your own role in this.

Its not pretty.

But it is a story that is going to be revealed."


I await this disclosure with baited breath. However, I could care less what you may say about person's roles. As I said earlier, I feel sorry for you for you will never know the lasting joy of having a true friend. You only have what you interpret as friends if they can serve you and do so well.

Mikado
 
Which new car Mikado? His, or mine?

Keep your opinions of friendship Mikado. They don't impress me.

You keep mentioning "others" who agree with you but I have yet to find any one of them who will step forward and agree with what you have been spouting.

You won't have to wait for too long Mikado.... so go ahead and breathe. Linda
 
Just one more comment on Mikados responses regarding Kim and her son. I have NEVER tried to make his death something that needs to be talked about here or anywhere. Kim understandably is very hurt by his loss. What Mother would not understand that.

But I will not be charged with motives I have never had. If I had ever wanted to make Kim uncomfortable regarding her sons loss I certainly could have. She gives me no credit for the restraint I have shown.

Mikado says that he is simply responding to my words but he and Kim continue to leave slanderous comments about me for the full public view on the ttownsendbrown.com site..... without any alteration or apology.

If that continues perhaps I will delve into the murder of Kims son. Why shouldn't I? She has not spared me any pain at all with her words on the HUT.... ( which she is the registered owner of.... thanks to Mikado)...... And Mikado plays each of us against the other.... knowing that it gets him where he wants to be.... connected.....

Kim should look at that very carefully and realize that he has placed her in a legal liability that could prove very uncomfortable.

Have they ever found out who killed your son Kim?

Mikado hides behind others. Its too bad that he is still doing that. Linda
 
Mikado has the gall to charge that I have " slandered" him in any way at all with "lies" but he and Kim on the Hut have allowed to stand messages such as this from Kim. ( who happens to be a member here too)

This is what she decided to write.....and I haven't bothered to counter it. But some things are ridiculous. What is worse they both have thought that they can write this kind of thing and get away with it. That will not happen.

The Quonset Hut ? View topic - Personal letter to Linda from Kim


She always writes in red so I will copy it the same way.....

Ok Linda you have finally got me pissed. You put things out there you know nothing about and that are no ones business. So that should be okay for others to do. So here goes....

1. You, yourself, told me that you have no feelings for George (your husband for those who don't know who he is). He is nothing more than a habit to you. You said you are with him because he is the one paying the bills, so why would you want to leave that to be with someone who doesn't have a pot to pee in, when I asked you what you meant you said that Dave could offer you nothing.

2. You told me that the only reason George doesn't complain about your travels is because he has his "fun" when you're gone. I asked you if that bothered you and you said not at all, because you could care less about him or what he did.

3. Now we get to Dave....where to start, maybe with you "sleeping" with him just hours after meeting up with him here. (And don't ask for proof because you know this is the truth)

4. You told me that maybe one day you would tell them (George and Dave) that your daughter is more than likely Daves and not your husbands. You could have your own Jerry episode.

5. You told us (Mikado and me) about how you could not trust Andrew (Bolland). You said you were told to watch your back where he is concerned. You felt that he was telling his wife everything about the meetings and you didn't trust her at all.

6. You told me how many times Andrews' wife was "tested" by Twigsnapper, and she failed every time. You told me she had so many affairs that you couldn't keep track of them all but there is a record of all of them, in case you need them one day to prove to Andrew exactly why she married him.

7. I could talk about the time travel but I'll wait til another time for that.

I could go on and at some point I may, but for now Linda, leave my family out of your mouth, especially MY SON !!!!
HOW DARE you insult the memory of him!!!! I have NEVER downgraded anyone who is not here to defend themselves. In my eyes you are no kind of mother, for if you were, you would never speak of a deceased child as you did. You have stepped over the boundary this time Linda and if your followers read this, I don't know how they WOULD or COULD agree with what you did. Anyone with even the smallest bit of compassion or who is a parent can see just how petty that was of you. How low can you go Linda? Actually, writing what you wrote, proves to me just how low you are.

Here, why don't we put in a link to the cosmic-token so that others can see exactly how Kim and I are discussed. The quote is something that Linda took from the Hut.

? View topic - Regarding the HUT

the above link said:
Re: Regarding the HUT
Postby Linda Brown » Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:09 pm

I think that you might have been right about that " lady in disquise with the baby"

This is Mikados response to the message I sent to Kim. Interesting that he feels such a need to answer for her....

from ttownsendbrown.com

A couple of things Linda.

1. You and I agreed to never tell Kim who YOU suspected the blonde haired lady to be. Well, she knows now but it wasn't you that told her, it was Rose who bleated that out and even mentioned that she would have liked to know what made Charles Miller laugh. It was not her position to mention it to Kim.

2. Speaking of Helen Towt, I put the name of her Mother's obit in to prove that I had the correct person which you have just verified, therefore, I can prove beyond a doubt that you have misrepresented certain facts in regard to Helen Towt.

3. You need to correct Little enki. First, he is NOT the Dave that Kim was referring to and you know that. Second, you tell him to bring on his Remote Viewing attack for he is outgunned and you know it. I don't take threats, either psychic or physical lightly and you need to impart that to your little twit, pure and simple.

4. You know very well that the implication of saying the word "drugs" would have been taken in a derogatory manner by the casual reader. You know the prescription drugs Kim was taken were started after her son was murdered and that was on January 1st, 2010. Check your dates, the blonde haired lady was coming around back in '08. You know that but you just have shown everyone how you work. You misrepresent the facts and twist them to what your needs are and the hell with accuracy.

And as a side note, I remember when Kim was laying along side of her son hooked up to life support and she begged me to get in touch with you....that is how much she thought of you. However, she has watched this all unfold and she has SEEN the proof I have and then think about why she can be so bitter. Perhaps because she knows how devoted I was to you. She saw what I did and I how I backed you and stood up for you. And then she saw how you turned. What did you expect? Kim to sit on her hands with what she not only saw but knew?

5. You know I can back up everything I have ever said. Do you think that others cannot see how you are doing the "poor little me" routine? "Oh everyone, look at how Mikado has treated me". You started it long ago, the facts can be verified but your stories can't but then we will see when the lawyer comes around and we are all in depositions.

As to Helen Towt, I am NOT denigrating her memory, I am correcting the facts that you have presented and twisted to fit your agenda. Helen Towt was not your daughter or a blood relative and you feel slighted that I would mention her? What about what you just did? You took a situation between a Mother and Son and used it to portray Kim as a drug user. You twisted the facts as you always do to fit your need. If you seriously thought that whatever vision she sees as drug induced, you could have easily inserted the word "prescription" before the word drugs but then why do that, it wouldn't have fit your needs.

Now ask yourself this question before you continue this - "What is it that Mikado has that will prove that the information I gave about Helen was wrong?" And when you answer yourself, ask this - "If he continues to poke holes in my story, how much will people believe me?"

Let it be Linda and tell your little enki to prove himself and bring it on. I await his astral presence.

Mikado

PS: as to astral attack, ask Cat what that is REALLY called....and you align yourself with those who threaten..geez, where is the gutless Tracker? At least his was a physical threat and a bit more realistic.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I think that you are right Littleenki.... I think what we have here is pure evil dressed up in a ladies outfit.....do not react to his calls. ( I say that to you because this is not your fight.... its really mine....... Linda

And to not confuse anyone, here is the post from littleenki with the veiled threat of a psychic attack:

? View topic - Regarding the HUT

link above said:
(internal quote from post redacted)
Just a thought, Linda, if I am the "David" spoken of, I think it is pertinent to point out that when RVing last night, I had a scene of a man dressed in woman's clothing in a lifeboat with a baby. She(or he) was trying to call me over from the beach, and I refused because I felt threatened. She began yelling and stood up in the boat and waved her arms madly, then fell in and drowned. It was disturbing scene,because I couldnt save her, but now Im glad I didnt;D.(KIM?)
I was trying to view the Eldridge, to look for that gold(windings) and she drifted into the view!
I hope to see her again sometime, and tell her to be nice, and we can all just get along, but if need be, you know I have a little RV surprise saved up for people who threaten others, that I came up with myself.
Raymond would be proud, and Ive only done it once, with great success on my part, and not so great on the victim's part.

Cheers! and happy relaxing thoughts to you, Linda
Littleenki

I highlighted the pertinent part in red. And these are those who speak of benevolent "deer in the forest". Who extol the coming of a new age where there is no war, where the human race lives in peace. However, I suppose it is okay to not only send out emails and threaten one's family (Gutless Marine who was in all likely hood Linda) but to also use psychic attack and for what? (I say "attack" since the party was identified as a "victim") Portraying and reporting facts, public facts ?

The David that was mentioned is the David that Linda identified as Morgan to proved to be false. The man's whereabouts can be documented, of which I have some of the documentation, which proves by the public record that he could not be the Morgan that Linda has presented.

I must say that I cannot help but wonder if anyone on this forum is sick of all this. Not a thing is said from Kim and Linda comes after Kim with a post. So, who or what rattled Linda's chain to justify it? Who is the one that is habitually and consistently attempting to create this back and forth posting? Is there not anyone on here who is intelligent and objective enough to see who posts first?

Look at who posts veiled threats as to people being used and harmful things happening to them as Linda has posted about me?

Who is really the bully and what purpose does it serve? Who has the real agenda?

....and who/whom is really afraid of whom?

Mikado
 
Just one more comment on Mikados responses regarding Kim and her son. I have NEVER tried to make his death something that needs to be talked about here or anywhere. Kim understandably is very hurt by his loss. What Mother would not understand that.

You did so on the Token, it is there. It is the fact that you talked about her son that prompted the letter from Kim. In the face of it all just continue to lie and shout the loudest.

But I will not be charged with motives I have never had. If I had ever wanted to make Kim uncomfortable regarding her sons loss I certainly could have. She gives me no credit for the restraint I have shown.

Who posted first? You did on the Hut which is the reason Kim responded.

Who posted here first? Certainly not Kim.

Mikado says that he is simply responding to my words but he and Kim continue to leave slanderous comments about me for the full public view on the ttownsendbrown.com site..... without any alteration or apology.

Really? When was the last time I posted? You use the word "continue". The last time I posted on the Hut was Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:11 am. The last time Kim posted was Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:39 pm. So, what exactly is your definition of "continue"? How exactly is an apology required after all your continuing posts both here and on the Token? Do you see how you own actions oppose your claims? Would that be referred to as lying? I pose these questions just as you do however, the difference is that the proof is here in your own words and actions of posting.

If that continues perhaps I will delve into the murder of Kims son. Why shouldn't I? She has not spared me any pain at all with her words on the HUT.... ( which she is the registered owner of.... thanks to Mikado)...... And Mikado plays each of us against the other.... knowing that it gets him where he wants to be.... connected.....

You are either flat out lying or you are just talking with a paper asshole. Which is it? I have never played Kim against you or vice versa. Kim speaks for herself.

Kim should look at that very carefully and realize that he has placed her in a legal liability that could prove very uncomfortable.

Oh for cripes sake, just bring it on or shut up. We both anticipate having a good time watching you proven false on the stand, that is, if that is what you really want but my advice, which you will not take, is to just shut up and I won't bother you. Post about Kim or I and I will be there to correct and rebut.

As a side note, who is the legal owner of the Token?.....oh yeah...Beale. Who is the legal owner of any site you have posted untruths on? Think about that Linda for you are implicating others who may not want to be implicated.

Have they ever found out who killed your son Kim?

No, they have not but they do have suspects. Now for all those reading this, what would be the motive for Linda to even bring this up? Emotional stress is what I see...the need to inflict pain upon another.

Mikado hides behind others. Its too bad that he is still doing that. Linda


And just so others can see how they have responded to Linda dragging Kim's son into this sordidness, here is another post from the Hut.

The Quonset Hut ? View topic - Personal letter to Linda from Kim

link above said:
Re: Personal letter to Linda from Kim
Postby catspaw1950 » Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:57 pm

No parent should have to endure what Kim has. For anyone to use that to dig at Kim and/or Mikado is beyond low. I'm siding with Kim on this one.

Cat
A time just for plantin', a time just for ploughin'.
A time just for livin'. A place for to die.
'Twas so good to be young then, to be close to the earth.
Now the green leaves of summer are callin' me home.
User avatar
catspaw1950
Commander

Posts: 2025
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 5:27 pm
Location: out of the broom closet

You are true to what your classmates have said about you.

Mikado
 
Mikado is so busy reading from the script that he has been given that I haven't seen an original thought in months.

Have any of you noticed the red advertising banner that shows up at the top of the Unhypnotize Forum when you log on. Does it just happen with me.... the Banner says ITS BETTER IN THE BAHAMAS

And if no one else is seeing it then it is a great cosmic message to me personally.

If ALL of you see it........ then I take it as a GRAND cosmic message to all of us!

I used to call them Cosmic Hahas!

Fruitbat.... are you monitoring these pages.... what we have talked about is more important than all of the silly messaging between Mikado and me. Its obvious what is going on there for those who can see.

Lets go back to the fifties when the Russians suddenly started taking pyschic " attacks" seriously.

Think about submarines. Think about Rickover.... think about the Nautilus.....and remember the phrase that Sarbacher leaked to the Canadian Wilber Smith. " There is a project more secret than the bomb..." Paraphrasing here.... its worth looking up but all of the little dots are finally finding themselves and no trips off into the " giggle weeds" of Mikados mind are going to delay that information.

Linda
 
And to Mikado.... I only listen to one of my former classmates...And yes, I am trying very hard to live up to his expectations. Linda
 
Lets talk a little bit about Pyschic spies in the fifties.

Did any of you know that there is a rumor that the Nautilus was fielding experiments on things that they later called " REmote Viewing".

Did you all realize that Admiral Rickover was so " hands on" with the nuclear submarine program that no single sailor was brought into the program without going past his critical review personally.

Jeanne Manning has written that Admiral Rickover told Townsend Brown to " walk away" from his propulsion project ( then called Project Winterhaven).... and that he had addressed him by his first name...... I haven't talked to her yet to find out exactly how she knew that happened.....but thats on my list soon.


a FLIPPING BIG ICEBERG HERE FOLKS...... and if we get absorbed in looking at the mountain we lose sight of what is submerged.

Linda
 
Back
Top