I guess he was right. You were lost a very long time ago. Linda
Who said I was lost? Who was "he"? Are you talking about Morgan? Now is that Dave or the Morgan that exists in your fantasy world? Is this response the best you can do? What's the matter Linda, did my post explain too much and that it didn't fit your agenda in the attempt to cast me as some kind of fraud?
The email is real, ask Rose, ask Paul.
And let me correct you on you "so-called" legal term that you made up that couldn't have come from a REAL attorney. "Failure to act in good faith" is not cause for a tort but could be used as argument only. The tort would have to be drawn under a statute and that can vary from state to state, so, since the transaction occurred in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, you would have to hire an attorney here, or get an attorney in California or somewhere that is admitted to the Bar and can practice here.
Now the first thing you need to understand is that you would have to file under corporate law but any attorney worth his salt would file both under corporate law and individually in that would cover everything. Sort of like throwing it at the wall to see what sticks. But I am going to be helpful here for you. You cannot file under Fraud because you are barred from doing so due to a two year statute limit unless you can prove something otherwise and that would be that the statute begins to run from the time the fraud became apparent. In your case you would do what you do best and just lie. However, you could say that you first found out in August of 2011 which is when you started all this about the money but then, I could make a very good defense that would more than likely dismiss that particular count. Now the next statute you might want to consider would be "Breach of fiduciary". That might be your best attack but again, I can make a very good defense that would have that count dismissed as well. Now the best thing you could do would be to bring a count that would be the co-mingling of personal funds into Hut B. Use of invested funds for personal use and a host of others. But in any event, it all boils down to one thing. You have given me the perfect defense. An email that was sent out and you refused to respond and when you did, it was as a comment on a public forum. What you must understand is, you were given "due and timely notice" to attend the culmination of Hut B's work, you refused. You also have publicly stated that you want nothing to do with me or Hut B. You have publicly stated that you hope Hut B would fail and that others have surpassed what we have done which I believe to be a lie.
And the best is that I can and would bring in a portable supply and demonstrate to the court the culmination of the work and then at the same time you file your charges, I would bring a counter suit against you, the owners of the Token and any other forum that hosts your statements for all the libelous statements you have posted on the Token without the ability to back up those statements with facts that they are based upon and as to the owners of said forums for allowing violations of their own TOS (Terms of Service).
As to anything I have said (hypocrite etc), I can back it up with evidence and one thing you must understand, just ask one of the two attorneys you have is that cases are won by the preponderance of the evidence. In other words, whose has the most and who has the most believable and I have witnesses. Tread lightly...missy.
So, am I lost? I gather that it would be determined by a point of reference. Usually, one doesn't realize they are lost for first there is denial and then the reality sets in. Am I lost? I don't think so for I have answers to your Father's work that I would bet that he didn't have and in my world, I have answers and have found solutions and to me, I am not lost.
Now, answer the questions above...but I know you won't because you can't...your world would fall apart.
Mikado