Really hobbit?
Every post I have made has been after a post by Linda.
Read them again. Look at how Linda stokes the fires. Read what she writes with her assumptive conclusions based upon poor comprehension and convoluted interpretations of what I have written. Look at how she wrote that I started in at 2004 on Paul's forum when the reality is that the forum was started around March of 2006. Look at how she presented a I inferred Ernestine was a classmate from Great Valley. And the list goes on and in every instance, I posted a rebuttal and in some instances due to her poor comprehension of not only what I posted but also of past posts across several forums.
She holds herself with no accountability for anything she says and when someone rebuts her she totally ignores what she said to create the rebuttal in the first place and then claims that the "rebutter" is picking on her.
Should I go on? I haven't read any of her replies since my post last night after I said "shame" to her. She lays out statements that contain only a modicum of the truth and the whole while, individuals believe her and hang on every word while she accuses others of inconsistencies when the reality is that she is master of inconsistencies.
Look at the past pages of posts. I mentioned "Rainbow Parasensory" and all of a sudden, Linda comes on with some facts and in the end claims that "a little bird" told her and then proceeds to thank them for it. An apparent truth, and I am sure I will be rebutted on this, is obvious in that if one were to Google "Rainbow Parasensory", the very first "url" that comes up is this:
Rainbow Parasensory Science Associates - Pennsylvania Company Profile (People Search and Company Search)
If you look at this site you will see that it contains what she claimed came from a little bird. Can't anyone see that she had no information prior to my posting the name and then all of a sudden she has a "little bird" give her information. Why is it that all the "little birds" that give information always happen after the fact, for example, the phone call in regard to Fred that was the catalyst for his removal as Hut Master?
This thread is in regard to the "Rain on the Window Papers". Where are they? Has anyone seen these who can attest to their existence? Oh, I forgot, Morgan took some of them. This would be the same Morgan/Logan/Barrett/JD Garrett who Linda claimed was her High School sweetheart who was dead but then was tracked down by me, still alive I might add, and eventually denied ever being the character she claimed he was. I asked him about the papers, several times, and he didn't have a clue what I was talking about. In fact, and I reiterate, he denies being the character, he denies ever knowing Chuck Norris and what Linda didn't realize at the time I tracked him down was that I knew who he was, I just didn't know he was who she was talking about. In fact, when I first met him, I didn't recognize him for when I used to see him, he was a homeless individual living off of what ever he could find in a dumpster and surviving by growing pot in the hills of Charlestown and what ever scrap he could acquire to sell.
Believe it or not, but there are many individuals in the town of Phoenixville who know him and know his past...
What does this have to do with being on the topic? Everything. Morgan, at least the character identified by Linda, never took any of the papers as she has claimed. If he didn't take them then did they ever exist in the manner that they were presented? I find it very convenient that some of the papers are missing from the original, taken by a man that doesn't exist and that very same man who was identified as being the non-existent person denies ever taking them. An inconsistency?
Therefore, if "Morgan" is not the person Linda claims he is, by his own admission to more than one individual, then how can they be discussed since he never took the missing papers? How can something be discussed when the origin, the validation of that which is being discussed is in question?
Want to discuss them? Then discuss the "The Starseed Transmissions" by Ken Carey.
So hobbit, I leave this thread and will go to other threads. I have given my rebuttals on "The Rain..." papers. I do apologize for the thread topic diverging and I am partially to blame but then it does take two to Tango.
Just a side note hobbit, I am surprised you changed your addressing of me. I would have thought for sure that you would have addressed me as "MikDildo" as you did on the Token. Maybe you are finally growing up.
Mikado